Search for: "O'Connor v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2021, 9:00 am by Eugene Volokh
O Centro, which involved a small religious group's use of the hallucinogenic drug hoasca, and Holt v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:11 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (1971) (assessing whether government's interest is "substantial"). [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:41 am by Josh Blackman
[Flynt gave Justice O'Connor a complimentary subscription to Hustler magazine. [read post]
8 May 2021, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
These include opinions from Supreme Court Justices including Justices Sotomayor, Thomas, O'Connor, Ginsburg, and a six-Justice per curiam signed on to by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 2:57 pm by Josh Blackman
Those young immigrants do not have legal status in the United States under current statutory law. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 10:56 am
United States, the United States Supreme Court had found that the use of a thermal imaging device on a home violated the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 10:01 pm by Josh Blackman
" Justice O';Connor's dissent provided a more narrow test for "relatedness," or "germaneness. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 12:48 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
As had been widely reported, the federal government's legal position in California v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Justices Sandra Day OConnor and Anthony Kennedy are gone, after all. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 4:03 am by Michael Boyd
In the plurality opinion, Justice Sandra Day OConnor wrote that, although Hamdi’s detention was authorized by Congress, due process demanded that a citizen held in the United States as an enemy combatant must be given a meaningful opportunity to contest the factual basis for that detention before a neutral decisionmaker. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 9:31 am by Josh Blackman
Justice O'Connor offered this concise summary of Weber in her concurrence in Johnson v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 7:30 am by Ilya Somin
Thanks to the forceful dissents by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and Clarence Thomas, those—like myself—who favored a narrow interpretation of public use, could no longer be dismissed as extremists or ignoramuses. [read post]