Search for: "Oaks v. Cooper" Results 61 - 80 of 81
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2010, 7:49 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Aktas v Adepta (A Registered Charity) [2010] EWCA Civ 1170 (22 October 2010) Wilkinson & The Estate of Brian Wilkinson v Farmer [2010] EWCA Civ 1148 (22 October 2010) Law Debenture Trust Corporation Plc v Elektrim SA & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1142 (22 October 2010) Oakes, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1169 (22 October 2010) Dry, R (on the application of)… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:27 pm by Ken
Certainly she doesn’t seem bright enough to be familiar with Hustler v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
December 29, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
December 29, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Concord, MA; Eugene Bernat, President) Bay State Animal Cooperative, Inc. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:05 am
[Federal Register: April 8, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 68)][Rules and Regulations][Page 18944-18956]From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov][DOCID:fr08ap08-3] --------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 8 CFR Parts 214 and 274a [DHS No. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
View the article hereTimothy Fortney1, Jill Levenson2, Yolanda Brannon3 & Juanita N. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
Box 48314 Olympia, WA 98504-8314 Phone: (360) 586-3558; (800) 634-4473 (V/TTY/Toll Free) Web: www.wa.gov/ddc Helping Hands for the Disabled P.O. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Cystic Fibrosis Tennesse Cystic Fibrosis Chapter -- Knoxville Office 12 Oaks Executive Park 5401 Kingston Pike, Suite 185 Knoxville, TN 37919 Phone: (865) 583-0355 Fax: (865) 588-9699 E-mail: knoxville@cff.org Web: http://www.cff.org/knoxville.htm Tennesse Cystic Fibrosis Chapter -- Memphis Office 1028 Cresthaven, Suite 203 Memphis, TN 38119 Phone: (901) 818-9090 Fax: (901) 818-9080 E-mail: memphis@cff.org Web: http://www.cff.org/memphis.htm Tennessee Cystic Fibrosis Chapter 4825… [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
Phone: (404) 881-0292 Fax: (404) 881-6997 E-mail: gaaarp@aarp.org Web: http://www.aarp.orgga ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Southeast Disability and Business Technical Assistance Center Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access Georgia Tech, 490 10th Street Atlanta, GA 30318 Phone: (404) 385-0636; (800) 949-4232 (V/TTY/Toll Free) E-mail: sedbtac@catea.org Web: http://www.sedbtac.org Georgia ADA Exchange 4164 Admiral Drive Chamblee, GA 30341… [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 7:16 am
Springfield, IL 62704 Phone: (217) 782-9696 (V/TTY) Fax: (217) 524-5339 Web: http://www.state.il.usagency/ipcdd Down Syndrome Down Syndrome Development Counsel P.O. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
            Having determined that the due process requirement was no longer viable in light of the Supreme Court's decision in N.L.R.B. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 10:00 am
By way of example, in Rosenthal v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 9:54 am
" I was not aware of this statute until I read the Second Department's decision from last week in Rivera v Glen Oaks Vil. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 5:37 am
The criminal defendants in this appeal contend that the failure of the Government's cooperating witness to produce fifteen boxes of evidence until late in the trial constituted a violation of Brady v. [read post]