Search for: "Oil and Gas Title Holding Corporation"
Results 61 - 80
of 93
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2012, 5:25 am
He informed the Company a few months later he would be joining Hess Corporation, which engaged in the exploration, production, and sale of crude oil and natural gas. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
A significant issue related to oil and gas operations is whether emissions from individual operations, such as wells, processing plants and compressor stations, should be combined so that they become major sources for permitting purposes, subject to Title V requirements and New Source Review. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 4:56 am
- Oil & Gas: SEC Doubts Ability to Book PUDs Beyond 5 Years - Post-Proxy Access Decision: Which Way Forward? [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 8:02 am
To manage, control, sell, convey, exchange, partition, divide, subdivide, improve, or repair any real property; to grant options and to sell upon deferred payments; to lease for terms within or extending beyond the duration of this trust for any purpose, including exploration for and removal of gas, oil and minerals; to create restrictions, easements and other servitudes relating to any real property; to compromise, arbitrate or otherwise… [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:21 am
Encana Oil & Gas (USA), Inc. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Dept. of Energy, et al.Court: U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-1533 Opinion Date: August 16, 2011 Judge: King Areas of Law: Energy, Oil & Gas Law, Environmental Law, Government & Administrative Law The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) petitioned for review of a final rule promulgated by the U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
The combined effect of these holdings is to place investors in a Catch-22, encouraging them to pursue local remedies, while warning them that doing so may foreclose success at the international level. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
The combined effect of these holdings is to place investors in a Catch-22, encouraging them to pursue local remedies, while warning them that doing so may foreclose success at the international level. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 1:19 pm
They pushed oil and gas drilling, onshore and offshore. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
The argument is made both on a theoretical level and by a review of a specific issue in international investment law, namely, the development of wider types of claims and the rise of so-called “treaty shopping” by means of corporate group structuring. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
The argument is made both on a theoretical level and by a review of a specific issue in international investment law, namely, the development of wider types of claims and the rise of so-called “treaty shopping” by means of corporate group structuring. [read post]
14 May 2011, 1:34 pm
Emerald Oil and Gas Company. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
Hermetic Seal Corporation, 4232 Temple City Blvd. in Rosemead, was fined $28,000. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 4:31 pm
Supporters & Their Arguments for Proposition 23 Prop 23 is supported by businesses, union groups, the trucking industry, the California Republican Party, local chambers of commerce, and taxpayer groups.[10] Its top funding sources are oil companies such as Valero Energy Corporation, Tesoro Corporation, and Koch Industries, which have contributed the majority of Prop 23's approximately $8.2 million funding to date.[11] Other major oil companies, such as… [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Murphy Oil case, in which the plaintiffs alleged that energy companies’ greenhouse gas emissions had caused greater damage from Hurricane Katrina, was dismissed, not on the merits of the case, but based on the arcane procedural rules of appellate law. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Murphy Oil case, in which the plaintiffs alleged that energy companies’ greenhouse gas emissions had caused greater damage from Hurricane Katrina, was dismissed, not on the merits of the case, but based on the arcane procedural rules of appellate law. [read post]
21 May 2010, 5:30 am
Finally, the Court remarked that the plaintiffs’ relief that producer defendants pay them for the oil and gas that had been extracted was not a ‘significant relief’ from SEECO, rather, it was simply a redistribution of oil and gas proceeds based on the quiet title determination. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
Environmental Protection Agency a $38,500 penalty for violations of the Clean Water Act requirements related to the prevention of oil spills. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:12 am
Representing Appellant Lance Oil & Gas Company, Inc. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:37 pm
According to EPA, PCBs were improperly disposed when PCB transformer oil from two transformers on UB’s campus spilled/leaked onto the transformer cabinets, the concrete pads that the transformers stood on, and the nearby ground. [read post]
