Search for: "One World Techs., Inc. v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2016, 12:09 pm
United States, 268 U.S. 563, 566 (1925). [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 8:43 pm
With the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision in Google Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 3:12 pm
United States District Judge Steven D. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
It simply referred to a line of prior cases that had squarely rejected the legal theory and deferred to them (as lower courts are bound to do).On appeal, however, the Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, one of the premier advocacy groups for LGBT rights in the United States took over her case. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 3:35 pm
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
Woo Lae Oak, Inc; Kebab Gyros, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 4:27 am
There is a history of overbroad interpretation under laws such as the United States’ Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and this remains a significant concern with similarly vague language in other jurisdictions. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:04 pm
After applying and/or securing patent and other IP rights in the United States, SMEs should think globally. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:35 pm
" Nat'l Recovery Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
” (n.7) Perhaps “poaching” was already used to describe competition for employees in the high-tech world, but if not, it came to have that meaning. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 4:03 pm
Decisions this Week United StatesWhatsApp Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:17 am
Int’l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:41 pm
Summery but not so summary: EWCA (Civ) decision in trade mark infringement case Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd and Lichtenstein (IPKat) Nokia fakes case: silence over official submission (IPKat) UK’s Digital Economy Act hurts digital technology development (ipeg) United States US Patents Did the lack of software savvy patent attorneys cause a decline in patent quality? [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:25 pm
Of course, patents can be found whenever there is a technology revolution, and connecting the world through both traditionally high-tech and low-tech devices is absolutely a revolution. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am
”[xii] Effective Jan. 1 and July 15, 2020, Illinois and Kentucky, respectively, became the latest states to address smart contracts directly in legislation. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 1:29 pm
Likening the claims to those found ineligible in SmartGene, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Constellation alleged that World Tech Toys was an alter ego of World Trading. [read post]
