Search for: "Opinion and Order" Results 61 - 80 of 75,721
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2024, 12:39 pm by Michael V. Caracappa
This opinion illustrates the high threshold litigants must satisfy to secure sanctions under Rule 37(e)(2). [read post]
29 May 2024, 12:39 pm by Michael V. Caracappa
This opinion illustrates the high threshold litigants must satisfy to secure sanctions under Rule 37(e)(2). [read post]
29 May 2024, 12:39 pm by Michael V. Caracappa
This opinion illustrates the high threshold litigants must satisfy to secure sanctions under Rule 37(e)(2). [read post]
29 May 2024, 10:17 am by Alden Abbott
In March 2023, Khan indicated that the FTC would bring an RPA lawsuit “in short order. [read post]
29 May 2024, 5:52 am by Greg Lambert
Would the firm need to be on that version in order to get access to these features? [read post]
29 May 2024, 5:46 am by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
It is therefore of little importance to find out what the plaintiff actually created in order to assess the originality thereof.In the present case, the Court rejected the plaintiff's arguments, stating that “this plan organises the expression of a prospective scientific opinion based on a critical observation of the current state of knowledge in the field of nanomedicine. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
Lord Justice Green and Mr Justice Kerr found that the Government had acted unlawfully in creating the Public Order Act 2023, which gave the police “almost unlimited” powers to restrict protests. [read post]
28 May 2024, 10:03 am by Michael C. Dorf
Each opinion contains numerous outrageous statements, but here I want to focus on one key analytical move: reliance on another highly dubious precedent as beyond challenge in order to buttress the highly dubious conclusion in the case under consideration.In Dobbs, the Alito majority summarily rejected the contention that the abortion right can be grounded in equal protection based on a citation of the extremely obtuse Geduldig v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:56 am by Tobin Admin
The Opinion of the Court of Appeals Judge E. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:42 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
In the German proceedings the patent had been limited following a preliminary opinion of the Federal Patent Court which considered the patent valid on the basis of an auxiliary request (AR 1). 10x Genomics asserted the patent before the Munich Local Division as limited in the German nullity proceedings. [read post]
28 May 2024, 8:29 am by Dennis Crouch
Opinion by Judge Lourie, joined by Judges Reyna and Chen. [read post]