Search for: "Opinion of the Judges" Results 61 - 80 of 83,579
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Here is a summary of the key language from the majority opinion by Judge Rivera:As we explained in U.S. [read post]
25 May 2024, 1:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
Univ. of Pennsylvania, decided Friday by the Third Circuit, in an opinion by Judge Tamika Montgomery-Reeves, joined by Judges David Porter and Jane Roth: In 2020, Doe enrolled as a student in UPenn's Pre-Med Post-Baccalaureate Program …. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm by Christine Kexel Chabot
The time-intensive historical inquiries demanded by originalism pose challenges for district and court of appeals judges with many cases to decide. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:40 pm by Adil Ahmad Haque
Nevertheless, as we shall see, two judges prefer this reading. [read post]
24 May 2024, 12:47 pm by John Ross
[Private prisons, Pyrrhic victories, and a single-family hotel.] [read post]
24 May 2024, 11:33 am by Conner Porterfield
  In the lone dissenting opinion, Judge Wallace agreed with the majority’s decision that the University’s lack of a social media policy should not have prevented the Police Officer’s termination; however, she noted that Court was quick to replace the arbitrator’s judgment with its own. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
” In dissent, Judge Daniel Collins concluded that those provisions were “inconsistent with the text of the CWA. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:05 am by Emile Ayoub
It considers CAI “sensitive,” and thus subject to enhanced safeguards, if it is known or reasonably expected to contain: a “substantial volume” of personally identifiable information (PII) regarding U.S. persons; or a “greater than de minimis volume” of: Sensitive data, defined as PII of U.S. persons that concerns information such as the individual’s race, political opinions, religious beliefs, health information, sexual orientation, gender… [read post]
24 May 2024, 5:47 am by Chris Sutton
Any views or opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and are not necessarily the views of any client. [read post]
24 May 2024, 4:59 am
In re Rise Above, Serial No. 88735273 (May 13, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Mohamed Moussa
It is worth noting here that unanimity voting undermines the ‘nemo judex’ rule by allowing one state majority to judge its own case and block legislation favourable to minorities across the entire union. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Clarence Thomas filed an opinion concurring in part with the majority. [read post]
23 May 2024, 7:01 am by Alex Phipps
Judge Stroud concurred by separate opinion, and concurred with the majority opinion except as to the citation of certain unpublished cases that were not argued by the parties. [read post]