Search for: "Orange County Supreme Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,377
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2023, 6:41 am
Supreme Court case of Groff v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 2:23 pm
DeJoy: Protecting Religious Accommodation Rights in the Workplace appeared first on Orange County Employment Lawyers Blog. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 2:21 pm
Continue Reading › The post Supreme Court Rules Against Race-Conscious Admissions in Harvard and UNC appeared first on Orange County Employment Lawyers Blog. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 3:48 pm
Supreme Court reversed. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:16 pm
June 24, 2023, Los Angeles Employment Lawyer Blog The post California Employers Not Liable for ‘Take-Home Covid,’ State High Court Rules appeared first on Orange County Employment Lawyers Blog. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court to rule in his favor in business disputes, flew Justice Samuel Alito to a luxury fishing resort in Alaska resort on his private jet, a trip that would have cost Alito more than $100,000 one way if he had chartered the jet on his own. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
Background In June 2014, the Department of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) filed a complaint against Kolla’s Inc., a nightclub in Orange County, California, and its owner. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
But in a 2013 case, Shelby County v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 8:48 pm
On defendants’ pre-answer motion, Albany County Commercial Division Justice Richard M. [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:30 am
“Particularly since the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has reprimanded Plymouth City Council and Norfolk County Council for failing to respond to the public when asked for personal information held about them – known as a Subject Access Request (SAR). [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
Matter of McDevitt v Suffolk County, 183 AD3d 826; Matter of Convers v County of Orange, 139 AD3d 1060; 9. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
Matter of McDevitt v Suffolk County, 183 AD3d 826; Matter of Convers v County of Orange, 139 AD3d 1060; 9. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:50 am
Supreme Court More Blog Entries: Myths About California Wrongful Termination Claims, April 18, 2023, Los Angeles Employment Lawyer Blog The post After-Acquired Evidence Can’t be Used as a Catch-All Defense in California Employment Lawsuit appeared first on Orange County Employment Lawyers Blog. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 8:55 am
Officers Must Follow These Guidelines According to two decisions made by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Com. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Clarence Thomas and the Billionaire ProPublica – Joshua Kaplan, Justin Elliott, and Alex Mierjeski | Published: 4/6/2023 Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas accepted luxury trips around the globe for more than two decades, including travel on a superyacht and private jet, from a prominent Republican donor without disclosing them. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 3:01 pm
The Parties irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of any federal or state court located within Maricopa County, Arizona over any dispute arising out of or related to this Agreement. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 11:00 pm
FALL CAUSED BY SMALL PUDDLE DIDN’T CUT ITWhile at a Planet Fitness facility up in Newburgh (Orange County), a puddle of water that had accumulated in the vicinity of the men’s locker room shower purportedly caused J.B. to slip and fall.After he filed a personal-injury lawsuit with the Ulster County Supreme Court, a judge ended up dismissing the case, not only because the gym and other defendants lacked notice of the condition but because the… [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 5:04 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 2:46 pm
Sungaila discusses the disproportionate share (in a good way) of women on the Supreme Court benches in Michigan and Washington and the desire to diversify the courts in those states. [read post]
