Search for: "Oregon v. Baker" Results 61 - 80 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm by Mark Murakami
Matteoni, Matteoni O’Laughlin & Hechtman, San Jose, California, Edward V. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm by Law Lady
Supreme Court -- The relevant clearly established federal law is standard for ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland, which requires a showing of “both deficient performance by counsel and prejudice” JEFF PREMO, SUPERINTENDENT, OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Petitioner v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  We found a lot of cases – at least something useful from 42 jurisdictions:  all except Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.As alluded to earlier, plaintiffs sometimes try to overcome inconvenient facts about a failure to read warnings with quirky arguments that the defendant should have communicated in a different fashion. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 12:50 pm by Tobias Lutzi
Ginsburg had an opportunity to revisit a similar question about thirty years later, when delivering the opinion of the Court in Baker v General Motor Corp (522 US 222 (1998)). [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:40 pm by Matt Gluck
In the latest development in the Trump v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Instead, it was a statement by James Baker, then a spokesman for Republican presidential candidate George W. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
She would have held that the Oregon Supreme Court had faithfully applied Gore and State Farm v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Last term, the Supreme Court voted 5-3 against reviving the nondelegation doctrine in Gundy v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:37 am by Peter Mahler
Earlier this year, using as a springboard the Maryland intermediate appellate court’s decision in Eastland Food Corp. v Mekhaya, I posted about a topic on which there’s little or no New York law, viz., whether a complaint for minority shareholder oppression stated a valid claim centered on allegations that the directors/majority shareholders, instead of declaring profit distributions for all shareholders, were taking disguised distributions in the form of excessive compensation… [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 10:12 am by Aaron Jue
EFF has adamantly defended encryption and its widespread use from the early days of Bernstein v. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm by law shucks
KPMG and Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]