Search for: "Osborn v State"
Results 61 - 80
of 369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2019, 4:17 am
“Upon the filing of a voluntary bankruptcy petition, all property which a debtor owns, including a cause of action, vests in the bankruptcy estate” (Keegan v Moriarty-Morris, 153 AD3d 683, 684 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see 11 USC § 541[a][1]; Osborne v Tulis [In re Osborne], 2013 US Dist LEXIS 190402, *5-6). [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:14 am
Sebastiampillai v Parr. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 10:21 am
This happened a few terms ago in Visa Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 4:28 pm
Alex Vakil is a senior associate in the Media and Information Law team at Osborne Clarke [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
And an active one it is indeed, with the state supreme court asked to weigh in on a regular basis. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 6:19 am
”) Osborne v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:41 am
In State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 4:33 am
” Wei Cheng Chang v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
Henry v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
Osborn, 447 S.W.3d 390, 394 (Tex. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 9:24 am
Boumediene v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
(This is copyright, not patent, so I'll note it again tomorrow, but the rest of the panel is more patent-focused.)Lucas Osborn – 3D printing raises IP issues.Randy Picker – Reviews computer competition and innovation over last 100 years, including how WWII government contracting decisions shaped the computer patent environment.Michael Risch – 19th century apple-parer patents are instructive, including in showing how patent enforcement can channel… [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
The Bank: An Historical Examination of Osborn v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:00 am
Aultman (1898) and United States v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 7:46 pm
First National State Bank, 87 N.J.176 (1981); Pascale v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 5:47 am
In Osborne v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am
Evening Standard editor George Osborne has criticised the proposed Data Protection Bill stating that cost amendment provisions shifting Claimants’ legal costs to papers would be unduly onerous. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 8:53 am
Stell v Obedkoff, [2000] OTC 742, 2000 CarswellOnt 4085 (Ont Sup Ct J). [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 11:35 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 7:34 am
Art 8 of GDPR states that if a child is under age of 16 then it requires parental consent but that this default age for lawful consent may be lowered by individual member states down to minimum of 13. [read post]
