Search for: "Other Defendants-Class III-a, Class III-b, Class III-c"
Results 61 - 80
of 473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2012, 3:00 pm
(II) Any person who violates the provisions of subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (a) commits: (A) A class 4 felony; or (B) A class 3 felony if the violation is committed subsequent to a prior conviction in this or any other state, the United States, or any territory subject to the jurisdiction of the United States of a violation to which subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (a) applies or would apply if committed in this state. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm
But our study found the assumptions that have acted to limit their options to be incorrect—biotech startups do not in fact pose greater securities class action risk than other companies. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 7:32 am
As a resource for class action defense attorneys who defend against RESPA (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act) class actions, we provide the text of Regulation X. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 7:12 am
For the class action defense attorney who defends against RESPA (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act) class actions, we provide the text of Regulation X. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 8:30 pm
) (3) (a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this subsection (3), if the loss, damage, value of services, or thing of value taken, or cost of restoration or repair caused by a violation of this section is: (I) Less than fifty dollars, computer crime is a class 1 petty offense; (II) Fifty dollars or more but less than three hundred dollars, computer crime is a class 3 misdemeanor; (III) Three hundred dollars or more but less than seven… [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 6:06 pm
During this same period, the dismissal rate for other nonfinancial cases actually declined slightly. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:21 pm
Injunction: the court certified the class under Rule 23(b)(2). [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
The Ninth Circuit agreed: The rule that a removed case in which the plaintiff lacks Article III standing must be remanded to state court under § 1447(c) applies as well to a case removed pursuant to CAFA as to any other type of removed case. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 8:07 am
Plaintiff underwent a hip resurfacing surgery in which defendant’s PMA, Class III medical device was implanted. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm
Sessions III (sitting by designation), the Second Circuit vacated the class certification order and remanded for further proceedings. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
Apr. 8, 2005), the court held that §1447(c) required remand, not dismissal, of a “no injury” class action where Article III standing did not exist. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm
Under Rules 23(b)(3) and 23(c)(4), the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:42 am
But other cases so holding involved plaintiffs who lacked statutory or Article III standing in the first place, unlike Henderson, who simply had the bankruptcy trustee step into her shoes as the real party in interest. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 8:30 am
As a resource for class action defense attorneys who defend against RESPA (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act) class actions, we provide the text of Regulation X. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 11:42 am
But none of the judges defended the district court's judgment the way Judge Callahan attacked it.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
12 Aug 2006, 7:14 am
., as a resource for class action defense attorneys. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
In these ways Dukes is relevant to every class action asserted against a manufacturer of prescription medical products.Part III of the Dukes opinion – the unanimous part (Part I is simply a factual/procedural history) – is narrower because it only concerns when an “injunctive” class can also seek forms of monetary relief. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 6:17 pm
July 7, 2008) In this class action litigation, defendant moved, pursuant to Fed. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 7:56 am
USA, Inc., which held that so long as an employee has suffered one Labor Code violation, he or she has state-proxy status to pursue PAGA penalties for alleged Labor Code violations not personally suffered but allegedly suffered by others. b) Ninth Circuit’ [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Assuming the question whether the parties consented to class arbitration in the face of the agreements' silence is for the Court to decide, the Court will likely apply: (a) the Federal Arbitration Act; (b) New York law governing contracts generally; and (c) federal maritime law. [read post]
