Search for: "Outcom, Inc. v. Department of Transportation" Results 61 - 80 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
 The USICA "is comprised of bills reported out of the committees on Commerce, Science, and Transportation; Foreign Relations; Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs; Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs; Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions; and the Judiciary. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am by Richard Hunt
Is this inability of plaintiff’s attorneys to get fees when they get the most successful outcome possible a problem? [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
In January 2009, Maddin was transporting cargo through Illinois when the brakes on his trailer froze because of subzero temperatures. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:54 pm by Richard Hunt
This requirement does not preclude later litigation; in fact, as in employment discrimination cases the complaining party will always have the alternative to sue whether or not there is a favorable outcome to the administrative process. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:59 am by Melanie Fontes
In April 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Department of Transportation (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 645, 656, fn. 8), and that “cases have wrestled with this distinction[.] [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
  Relying on the Second Circuit’s earlier decision in Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
The First District’s new published lead opinion (by Presiding Justice Pollak) continues to “distinguish” the Fourth District’s conflicting published appellate decisions in Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
The year 2019 is ending with the great rifts--opened in 2016, exposed in 2017, and acquiring a greater urgency and revealing the power of its consequences in 2018--now exposed. [read post]