Search for: "P Smith"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:13 am
Smith and Ryan K. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
https://protectthewild.substack.com/p/new-animation-end-hare-coursing Recent Extinctions Within the US States & Territories - A cause for concern. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 12:00 pm
Morgan Stanley agreed to pay a $35 million penalty to settle the charges, acknowledging violations of the Safeguards and Disposal Rules under Regulation S-P. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 1:22 pm
Kimberly Wehle in Politico: There’s been a lot of attention paid to the Supreme Court’s upcoming decision on Donald Trump’s claim of immunity from prosecution for actions taken while president, a judgment that will have big implications for the 2024… Continue reading The post “The ‘Sleeping Giant’ Case that Could Upend Jack Smith’s Prosecution of Trump” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
(Aug. 23, 2023), https://thenewdigest.substack.com/p/judge-raos-unintentional-surrender. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 4:04 am
P. 21. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 1:41 pm
Special counsel Jack Smith said in his indictment of the former president that… Continue reading The post “Trump lawyers’ doozy of a filing on voter fraud” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:00 am
"La entrada de las versiones originales de Mickey y Minnie al dominio público es notable, no solo por la popularidad de los personajes, sino también porque ésta se aplazó por casi cuatro décadas", escribe la licenciada Carolene Fontanet Smith (Saldaña, Carvajal & Vélez-Rivé, PSC). [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 7:41 pm
Down-Hearted Blues recorded by Bessie Smith. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
Smith (Marva) v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
LexisNexis has selected some of the top “noteworthy” panel decisions issued by the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board during the period July through December 2023. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 9:43 am
Smith fue una señal. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:19 am
SEC, December 19, 2023, Smith, J.).Default rule is vacatur. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
But impeachment by the House and conviction by the Senate have never been understood as necessary conditions for criminal prosecution of such federal officers.Judge Chutkan's opinion makes just this point (at p. 15a in Appendix 1 of Smith's cert petition). [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
The only S&P 500 company that disclosed material risk connected to lobbying on its annual report to investors was FirstEnergy, which was wrapped up in a recent scandal that thrust this issue into the spotlight. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:34 pm
Jess Bravin and Ryan Barber in the Wall Street Journal: Special counsel Jack Smith asked the Supreme Court to take up Donald Trump’s claim that he is immune from prosecution and can’t face criminal charges related to efforts to… Continue reading The post “Special Counsel Asks Supreme Court to Quickly Rule on Trump’s Immunity” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
” He then argued that there was “no requirement that they convene on the senate floor where, presumably, the Biden-Harris electors will convene,” so “[p]resumably” the fake electors “could convene in the senate gallery. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:24 pm
(Reardon Smith Line, at p. 574, per Lord Wilberforce) (Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) Bato v Cano, 2023 ABCJ 114 [10] I am satisfied that what is commonly referred to as “cock fighting” is illegal in Canada, and while there is ample argument on behalf of the Plaintiff to suggest that this activity is legal in the Philippines, I am not in a position to conclude that. [read post]
