Search for: "P v. Moore" Results 61 - 80 of 733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2023, 12:15 pm by Rick Hasen
Some proponents of the theory have proposed a… Continue reading The post “After the Oral Argument in Moore v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 5:24 pm by Rick Hasen
On Tuesday, he criticized Roberts’s opinion, saying… Continue reading The post Eastman Whines About Court’s Ruling in Moore v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 12:28 pm by Nicholas Stephanopoulos
Carolyn Shapiro, Dan Tokaji, and I are the amici in this brief in Moore v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 11:01 am by Rick Hasen
Anderson, Trump argues that the Colorado Supreme Court violated the federal Electors Clause when… Continue reading The post Weiser & Wolf: “Responding to Trump’s Moore/Independent State Legislature Theory Claim in Trump v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 4:53 am by Richard Pildes
Enough time has passed since the Court asked the parties to file letters on the jurisdictional issues that it seems highly unlikely the Court — if it is going to dismiss the case — will do so with a one-line… Continue reading The post One Way or Another, We are Likely to Get at Least Some Opinions in Moore v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 10:04 am by Derek Muller
Earlier, I blogged about how “mootness”… Continue reading The post What happens to Moore v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 2:21 pm
AL&P has a post about my post, and their title is Virginia sua sponte converts criminal procedure nerdery to jurisdictional oppression. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 2:38 pm by Rick Hasen
With news today that the Supreme Court cancelled oral argument in the Title 42 case on immigration after the Biden DOJ informed the Court that the Title 42 policy will end in a few months with the end of the… Continue reading The post Why Haven’t the Parties in Moore v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:45 am by Rick Hasen
It adds: “Although the Court has pending before it another petition for certiorari raising a similar question… Continue reading The post United States Files Letter in Supreme Court Saying that Moore v. [read post]