Search for: "P. Ledbetter"
Results 61 - 71
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2007, 1:04 am
More than most novice justices, Alito has taken bullets for business in the term just ended, most notably for his controversial majority opinion in Ledbetter v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:13 am
Richard P. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:56 pm
Lily Ledbetter is speaking. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Mar. 24, 2009)/p>Arbitration clause unenforceable against fem attorney's claim of sex discrim/HWE/retalWalsh v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
Feb. 20, 2004); Ledbetter v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm
Integrated scope proceeding would work; could lead a case to end b/c the P is claiming more than it has, but even if the case doesn’t end it’s an opportunity to articulate what’s protectable about the IP right. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
Fourth, the legislature made a finding that “[p]ay secrecy also contributes to the gender wage gap, because women cannot challenge wage discrimination that they do not know exists. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
Unified School District #501, in 2011, Gorsuch wrote an opinion narrowly construing the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act – which lengthens the statute of limitations for “discrimination in compensation claims” – to not apply when two school custodians were allegedly forced to accept transfers to other custodial positions with lower pay. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Superior Court (1997) 15 Cal. 4th 232, at p.250. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
United States, 507 F.3d 1233 (10th Cir. 2007), certified question answered, 2008 OK 26, 183 P.3d 1001 (wrote opinion) The 10th Circuit certified to the Oklahoma Supreme Court to the question of whether wrongful death action for nonviable stillborn fetus existed, under Oklahoma law, on date of delivery of fetus. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
[The statute immunizes computer services for "action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict ... availability of material that the provider ... considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected"—but what exactly does that mean?] [read post]
