Search for: "P. v. Jones" Results 61 - 80 of 1,177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2023, 12:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Regulators and courts will have to carefully assess whether public companies manipulated the valuation process to deceive investors or whether stock declines reflect the bursting of a bubble.[2] The equity market selloff in 2022, which contributed to the worst year since 2008 for the Dow Jones, S&P 500 and the NASDAQ, has exposed U.S. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 9:07 am by Russell Knight
“The [Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage] Act does not require an equal division of marital property, but an equitable division” In re Marriage of Jones, 543 NE 2d 119 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1989 Unless the parties work together in the business and agree to continue working together, the business will not be divided between the parties. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 2:50 am by Emma Kent
As a reminder… ‘Obvious & gross’ In the case of Wachtel v Wachtel [1973], the issue of conduct was considered by the family court and further summarised by Lady Hale in Miller [2006] as follows:“[…] once the assets are seen as a pool, and the couple as equal partners, then it is only equitable to take their conduct into account if one has been very much more to blame than the other: in the famous words of Ormrod J in Wachtel v Wachtel [1973] Fam… [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:20 am by Brett Natarelli
Circuit upheld the funding structure, but with little discussion (citing the Federal Reserve and OCC as financial regulators with budgets independent of most Congressional oversight, at p. 40-41). [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
Two days later, Judge Gibson dismissed proceedings in Zimmerman v Perkiss (No.2) [2022] NSWDC 458. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
Jones,[13] if the story is sufficiently focused on Pennsylvania—for instance, if it expressly discusses Norton and Glenn as being Pennsylvania residents saying things about each other in Pennsylvania—then Pennsylvania may well have personal jurisdiction over the lawsuit against Fox. [read post]