Search for: "P. v. Kramer"
Results 61 - 80
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2010, 4:26 am
In Zuid-Chemie v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm
Saini J has dismissed the claims in libel, slander per se and malicious falsehood in George v Cannell & another. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
In late 2005, Defendant Chronimed Holdings bought Northland Pharmacy from Plaintiff James P. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:37 am
In the case of Schaeffer v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:32 am
Kramer, 63 AD3d 723 quoting Klein v Gutman, 12 AD3d 417, 418, 784 NYS2d 581 [2004] [citations omitted]; see CPLR 3211[a][1]). [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
TechStock Standard has a post “David Kramer spread Steele dossier around Washington during Trump transition” The Press Gazette reports that Michael Leidig and Central European News have filed a notice of appeal after their $11m libel action against Buzzfeed was dismissed by a judge in New York. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Donn P. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:21 am
Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Matter of Doe v City of Schenectady, 2011 NY Slip Op 03694, Appellate Division, Third Department The City of Schenectady appealed an order and judgment of the Supreme Court Judge Barry Kramer that among other things, ”permanently enjoined” Schenectady from permitting the public to attend disciplinary hearings involving City of Schenectady police officers. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:00 am
And now Kentucky has followed suit.In Kindred Nursing Centers Ltd P’ship v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
As this term’s decision in Espinoza v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 7:14 pm
P. 52.8(c). [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:19 pm
From the New York Public Personnel Law written by Harvey Randall: Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Matter of Doe v City of Schenectady, 2011 NY Slip Op 03694, Appellate Division, Third Department The City of Schenectady appealed an order and judgment of the Supreme Court Judge Barry Kramer that among other things, ”permanently enjoined”… [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:44 am
Kramer Steven P. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
See also Kramer v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm
Nicholas, 565 F.3d at 911; see also Petroleum Pipe, 575 F.3d at 482 (citing Kramer v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 10:36 am
McNamara's ruling in Godfrey v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
" 152 Wash.2d 74, 78, 93 P.3d 161 (2004). [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:18 pm
Lemen, 156 P.3d 339, 347–49 (Cal. 2007); Sid Dillon Chevrolet v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 6:34 am
En cuanto a la rama legislativa véanse los proyectos P. de la C. 2073 de 24 de septiembre de 2009 y P. de la C. 2846 del 1 de septiembre de 2010 que no prosperaron en la legislatura; ambos reconocían la vigencia de la Ley 82 ya que proponían la derogación de la misma. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:29 am
Apr 24, 2008) (NO. 9478, 401620/04)Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York (Gary P. [read post]
