Search for: "P. v. Nichols"
Results 61 - 80
of 139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2014, 1:05 pm
Nichols, 169 Ariz. 409, 819 P.2d 995. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:52 am
,quoting Lyons v Lyons, 187 AD2d 415, 416 [2d Dept 1992]). [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:52 am
,quoting Lyons v Lyons, 187 AD2d 415, 416 [2d Dept 1992]). [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 8:26 am
CARBAUGH v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd., [2001] 1 All E.R. 700 (H.L.), at p. 706, per Lord Hoffmann; see also Nichols v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:16 am
Armstrong and Timothy P. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:49 am
App. 105, 201 P.3d 1086 (Washington Court of Appeals 2009). . . . [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 2:34 am
In the first case, U.S. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:18 am
This principle was explained most notably by Judge Learned Hand in the 1930 case Nichols v Universal Pictures: It is of course essential to any protection of literary property, whether at common-law or under the statute, that the right cannot be limited literally to the text, else a plagiarist would escape by immaterial variations. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:14 am
Kuddus v Chief Constable ([2002] 2 AC 122), the highly respected senior Law Lord, Lord Nicholls said “From time to time cases do arise where awards of compensatory damages are perceived as inadequate to achieve a just result between the parties. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:07 pm
Sir Robin Jacob (who retired from the Court of Appeal last year but was making one of his occasional reappearances) in giving the leading judgment noted Lord Nicholls in Mercedes Benz v Leiduck [1996] AC 284, p.308: “The court may grant an injunction against a party properly before it where this is required to avoid injustice […] The court habitually grants injunctions in respect of certain types of conduct. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Moderator will be Midyear Meeting Host Committee member Glenn P. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
In Arnstein v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:32 am
William P. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:04 am
[Toronto, Ont.] : Continuing Professional Development, Law Society of Upper Canada, 2012 1 v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am
Evaluating Microblog Content Value (PDF) - bit.ly/yJvEGK (P. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am
This could be a recipe for confusion” (Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457 [22], Lord Nicholls). [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
bit.ly/wVssl2 (Jim Eidelman) Privilege Or Work Product Waivers - bit.ly/xENsqj (Federal Evidence Review) Resolution on 'Pippins' Discovery Nears, Though Debate Continues - bit.ly/zTrmUQ (Evan Koblentz) Review Website Ordered to Close after Defaming and Harassing Lawyers - bit.ly/tV21Ex (Pinsent Masons) Singapore eDiscovery Case Update: Surface Stone Pte Ltd v Tay Seng Leon and Another [2011] SGHC 223 - bit.ly/AcLYYc (Serena Lim) Social Media Gotchas in Court - bit.ly/AlNxmG (Eric… [read post]
