Search for: "P. v. Potter"
Results 61 - 80
of 153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2012, 4:28 pm
His Voting Wars is a colorful, trenchant, fair-minded and powerfully-argued account of how partisanship and localism continue to haunt the administration of American elections more than a decade after Bush v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:10 am
Stephen Colbert took this issue on last night, with some help from Trevor Potter, and it was brilliant performance art. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 8:59 pm
Rowling, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (Scholastic Books, 2000), p. 723. [read post]
Lord Coke Completes His Come-Back; First Sale of Works Anywhere Defeats Copyright Claim, Court Holds
19 Mar 2013, 7:05 pm
Coke, Institutes of the Laws of England § 360, p. 223 (1628)). [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
Holm, 137 P.3d 726, 736 (Utah 2006). [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 11:36 pm
The chapter thereafter contains a deep and careful analysis of some of the most important questions in Indian copyright law today: copyrightability, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in EBC v Modak (2008) 1 SCC 1 (p 291 et seq, see in particular the author’s analysis of the American and Canadian law at p 296); tests for determining infringement (p 307 et seq); the nature of a cinematograph film copyright (p 328) and the fair use… [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:51 am
A (By his Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor) ([2010] 3 All ER 32) a differently constituted Court of Appeal (Lord Judge CJ, Lord Neuberger MR and Sir Mark Potter P) took this a stage further. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 7:02 pm
² The latest example is Calcano v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:30 am
Potter. 1998. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
Potter, M. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
They’re also obviously at risk of simply describing, in a laudatory manner, characteristics of the goods or services in question.CJEU Cases C-398/08 P Audi AG v OHIM (VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK) and C-311/11 P Smart Technologies ULC v OHIM (WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH), already blogged by Jeremy hereand here, set out the position in Europe. [read post]
31 May 2020, 7:06 pm
In Potter v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:24 pm
P. 11; City of Roanoke v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 5:24 am
In Gómez-Pérez v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:00 pm
P. 11; City of Roanoke v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
” (p. 7). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 2:49 am
., P&G Enterprises, Inc., and MHTJ Investments, Inc. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:54 pm
Hindsight should not be applied (Francis v Francis and Dickerson [1956] P 87 at 91.). [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:46 pm
In California, the governing authority is Potter v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:43 am
Potter, 268 P.3d 57 (N.M. [read post]
