Search for: "P. v. Smart"
Results 61 - 80
of 417
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2007, 7:54 pm
I love working with smart clients and their cool products and services. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
They’re also obviously at risk of simply describing, in a laudatory manner, characteristics of the goods or services in question.CJEU Cases C-398/08 P Audi AG v OHIM (VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK) and C-311/11 P Smart Technologies ULC v OHIM (WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH), already blogged by Jeremy hereand here, set out the position in Europe. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 5:58 am
Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 12:32 pm
This can be the case, for instance, where those marks are not merely ordinary advertising messages, but also possess a certain originality or resonance, requiring at least some interpretation by the relevant public, or setting off a cognitive process in the minds of that public (Audi v OHIM, C‑398/08 P). [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
American Nat’l Red Cross, 402 P.2d 584 (Ariz. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 3:32 pm
Torres v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
You read them by using your smart phone, starting a QR code app, and taking a picture of the code. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 8:56 am
(d) AFP v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 1:52 pm
Carello v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 10:35 am
Related posts:Laptops for College Students – A Smart Guide for Parents This question came up on the ABA’s Solosez list in...Best Tech for “Kids” Could be the Ultimate Stress Antidote for Lawyers I’m really not sure what BusinessWeek knows about toys –...Minimum Daily Tech Requirements – Part Three Now Available The third and final segment of my Technolawyer SmallLaw series... [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 5:59 pm
Three case studies are presented, including the restoration of the Everglades wetland ecosystem (as considered by the United States Supreme Court in 2004 in South Florida Water Management District v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 9:21 am
For starters, the purchase and sale agreement is worth taking a look at: Purchase and Sale Agreement re DYAC Website (see p. 36 of the .pdf for a breakdown of the traffic figures). [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 7:24 am
Mishan & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:26 am
Hours later, President-Elect Trump tweeted, ‘Great move on delay (by V. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 5:38 am
This guest post was written by Sean P. [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm
Chalking Is Not a Search Under the Fourth Amendment The Sixth Circuit relied on United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:57 am
Based on the buzz and activity in the exhibit hall, there are three things: 1) Cloud everything – whether practice management, document storage, collaboration, discovery, financial and document systems, what gets the crowd excited are any kind of cloud initiative. 2) Mac v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 3:15 pm
The quality of the DC judges is very high to begin with but this is a very smart panel. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:47 pm
Richard Nagareda, law professor at Vanderbilt, is a really smart guy. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:16 pm
Anyone care to do the stats to compare smart keyword searching against concept searching? [read post]
