Search for: "P. v. Smart"
Results 61 - 80
of 417
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2021, 3:20 pm
Smart, 814 So. 2d 530, 532 (Fla. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 1:16 am
Tanto si se considera un residuo del poder regio, como una potestad instrumental para asegurar los servicios públicos y el respeto al interés general, la potestad sancionadora es la reina de las potestades públicas, compartiendo con el poder judicial, la titánica autoridad punitiva. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm
The Guardian had an article “I spy: are smart doorbells creating a global surveillance network? [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm
Group Privacy – A Defense and an Interpretation, Luciano Floridi, University of Oxford – Oxford Internet Institute Emerging Applications on Smart Phones: The Role of Privacy Concerns and its Antecedents on Smart Phones Usage, International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology (IJCSIT) Vol 13, No 2, April 2021, Waleed Al-Ghaith, Shaqra University &ndash [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:07 pm
The Financial Times had an article “UK spies warn local authorities over ‘smart city’ tech risks”. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 5:36 pm
Privacy, Confidentiality and Property, P Torremans, ed, Intellectual Property and Human Rights (Kluwer Law International, 2008-2019), Peter Jaffey, University of Leicester. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 11:11 am
Form 12 resolutions have a bad Rep[p] in the Ninth. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 1:48 am
But that has changed dramatically, and with Sisvel v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Court Allows U.S. Prosecution for American's North Korea Speech About Cryptocurrency
28 Jan 2021, 3:09 pm
Griffith, decided yesterday by Judge P. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
After previously issuing a Draft EIR in 2012, and a Final EIR in 2017 for a 30-day review period which stated, “After the [FEIR] is circulated, if Caltrans decides to approve the [p]roject, a [NOD] will be published in compliance with CEQA by Caltrans . . . [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
After previously issuing a Draft EIR in 2012, and a Final EIR in 2017 for a 30-day review period which stated, “After the [FEIR] is circulated, if Caltrans decides to approve the [p]roject, a [NOD] will be published in compliance with CEQA by Caltrans . . . [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 7:19 pm
Wilson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 4:33 pm
Entre los desafíos que se han presentado a los gobiernos a nivel mundial a lo largo del 2020, se ubicó el procurar un punto medio entre la adopción de mecanismos de apoyo y alivio a los contribuyentes y la implementación de medidas que salvaguarden el correcto flujo de las finanzas públicas, a fin de atender las necesidades propias de la emergencia sanitaria. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 28060-20 Sturt v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27845-20 Garrity v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27809-20 Levick v The National, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 15320-20 Cook v Daily Express, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 12005-20 Oliver… [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
1. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm
See, e.g., the President’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee, Report to the President on the Internet of Things (November 2014), p. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
” The exception was a brief joined by Shannon P. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Mountain Lion Foundation v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:03 pm
My mentor, Sherwin P. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am
Ruling at the state’s First Appellate Court (Division One), Judge Ethan P. [read post]
