Search for: "P. v. Wilkinson" Results 61 - 80 of 93
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2011, 2:50 pm by Michael O'Hear
More specifically, the court rejected the defendants’ argument that conditions in a “supermax” prison were the most appropriate baseline for comparison: Wilkinson [v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a… [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:11 am
Pratt, 286 Mont. 156, 951 P.2d 37, 43-44 (Mont. 1997) (DUI); State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am by chief
Regular readers will recall that blanket policies are not to be encouraged (those with a need for more citable authority should see something like Lord Browne-Wilkinson in R v SSHD ex p Venables). [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am by chief
Regular readers will recall that blanket policies are not to be encouraged (those with a need for more citable authority should see something like Lord Browne-Wilkinson in R v SSHD ex p Venables). [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:41 am by Rosalind English
If the right balance is not struck then the Baby P scandal, and the resultant Sharon Shoesmith fiasco, may be a sign of things to come. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
Wilkinson, Youngstown News, March 31, 2010 A&L Salvage Landfill has agreed to more than a $4 million settlement with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency to correct long-standing problems at its closed landfill. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm by Tobias Thienel
(Wilkinson v Kitzinger [2007] EWHC 2022 (Fam), [2007] UKHRR 164, para 107, per Sir Mark Potter P) I'm not sure this reasoning hol [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:57 am by Matthew Nelson
Wilkinson in abeyance pending the Court’s resolution of People v. [read post]