Search for: "PARKS FOUNDATION V. CIR" Results 61 - 80 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Newhall Ranch Specific Plan (the specific plan) On May 27, 2003, the County of Los Angeles approved the Newhall Ranch “specific plan” that includes a broad range of residential, mixed-use and non-residential land uses within five villages, allowing for up to 21,308 dwelling units (including 423 second units), 629 acres of mixed-use development, 67 acres of commercial uses, 249 acres of business park land uses, 37 acres of visitor-serving uses, 1,014 acres of open space,… [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 10:47 am
Conduct is "malicious" for these purposes when it reflects "such a conscious and deliberate disregard of the interests of others that [it] may be called wilful or wanton" (Marinaccio v Town of Clarence, 20 NY3d 506, 511 [2013], quoting Dupree v Giugliano, 20 NY3d 921, 924 [2012]; see also Prozeralik v Capital Cities Communications, 82 NY2d 466, 479 [1993]; Carvel Corp. v Noonan, 350 F3d 6, 24 [2d Cir 2003]; Prosser & Keeton, Torts § 2 at 9 [5th… [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Superior Court (Environmental Law Foundation), ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2013 Cal. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 6:14 am
Mills, 664 F.2d 600, 608 (6th Cir. 1981); Smith v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am by Kali Borkoski
Amicus brief of the Mountain States Legal Foundation Reply of petitionersSupplemental brief of respondentSupplemental brief of petitionersCVSG Information:Invited: December 12, 2011Filed: May 24, 2012 (Deny) Georgia-Pacific West, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am by Kali Borkoski
Amicus brief of the Mountain States Legal Foundation Reply of petitionersSupplemental brief of respondentSupplemental brief of petitionersCVSG Information:Invited: December 12, 2011Filed: May 24, 2012 (Deny) Georgia-Pacific West, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:59 pm
• Dark liquid which appeared to be manure was observed seeping through the concrete foundation to the outside of the laying houses at the following locations: Layer 1 – Houses 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 11, 12, and 14; and Layer 3 – Houses 1, 8, 13, and 17. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:51 pm by Matt Cameron
Dept. of Health and Human Services, No. 10-2204  (1st Cir. 5/13/12), aff’g Gill v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am by Kiera Flynn
§§ 1332(d), 1453 (CAFA) on the ground that such private individuals are real parties in interest.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (4th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' replyAmicus brief of Washington Legal Foundation Christopher v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of Pacific Legal Foundation and Matthew Sissel Amicus brief of Mortimer Caplin & Sheldon Cohen Amicus brief of Mountain States Legal Foundation Amicus brief of HR Policy Association Petitioner’s reply   Dallas v. [read post]