Search for: "PARKS v. CITY OF ADA"
Results 61 - 80
of 135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2015, 6:44 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:38 am
The Court of Appeals says he may have a case.The case is Bernstein v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:11 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:29 pm
Park, J.D. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 3:46 am
In an appeal from Ada County arising from a petition for judicial review of the Boise City Council’s decision granting a conditional use permit for Royal Boulevard Associates to build an apartment complex near Boise State University, the Supreme Court reversed the decision of the district court affirming the City Council’s approval of the Boise Planning and Zoning Commission’s decision to grant the conditional use permit. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 5:03 am
UPS The ADAAA, Young v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:50 am
What do employers need to know about the Supreme Court’s pregnancy accommodation decision last week in Young v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:18 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:26 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 6:19 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 7:39 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:50 am
The court affirmed summary judgment for the BPD on the plaintiffs’ due process, ADA, and Section 1983 failure to train and supervise claims (Jones v City of Boston, May 7, 2014, Kayatta, W, Jr). [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 6:50 pm
Fahey v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:20 am
She then began construction on a parking pad behind her house, and incidentally put some gravel on the alley, but city officials threatened to fine her and placed a "road closed" sign in front of the alley.On cross motions for summary judgment, the district court concluded that the city's actions constituted a failure to accommodate that violated the Fair Housing Act and the ADA. [read post]
17 May 2013, 8:00 am
Dan’s City Used Cars, Inc., v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 3:54 pm
City of Lafayette, the 1A prohibits punishment for pure thought. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 8:51 am
” City of Oceanside v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 6:04 am
City of Arlington (blogged about here), which held that the statute of limitations in an accessibility suit under Title II of the ADA does not begin to run until the plaintiff knew or should have known of the inaccessibility of the facilities at issue. [read post]
