Search for: "PAUL BESTE V." Results 61 - 80 of 2,060
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2009, 8:45 am
Anyway, I was delighted to be able to go back and pick up the "debate" (if you can call it that) between Paul Krugman and John B. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
As the Court said in CBC v Canada, such limited openness “[a]t best…represents private selective scrutiny without any ability to express the results of that scrutiny. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 6:29 am
Best Buy Co., Inc., [1] the Eighth Circuit interpreted and applied the Supreme Court’s decision in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:44 am by Edward Hartnett
  Interestingly, he suggested tying this case to the anti-commandeering principle of New York v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 12:30 am by Bystander
It is reported today that Paul Gascoigne, once one of the world's best footballers, has pleaded Not Guilty to drink-driving, and that the case has been put off for trial before magistrates (unless a DJ snaffles the case, as so often happens with celebs). [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 6:22 pm
Contents include:Monique Hazelhorst, Mutual Trust Under Pressure: Civil Justice Cooperation in the EU and the Rule of Law Tine Van Hof & Thalia Kruger, Separation from the Abducting Parent and the Best Interests of the Child: A Comparative Analysis of Case Law in Belgium, France and Switzerland Paul David Mora, Universal Civil Jurisdiction and Forum Necessitatis: The Confusion of Public and Private International Law in Naït-Liman v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 8:15 am
  Excluding witnesses is called sequestration.As noted by Judge Paul V. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:21 pm by Orin Kerr
Three quick thoughts on the coverage: 1) Although I agree that Clement is the best proven Supreme Court advocate of his generation, I’m not as sure that Clement was the best pick for the state challengers in this case. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:11 pm
  The Ninth Circuit is just as good as the Arizona Supreme Court -- or at least nearly as good -- at giving it its best shot.This is the kind of fact-bound case that, if I were on the Arizona Supreme Court, I'd almost certainly say doesn't deserve review. [read post]