Search for: "PETERS v. PETERS" Results 61 - 80 of 8,500
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Calvert, Joanne Freeman, David Konig, Jill Lepore, Peter S. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:22 am by admin
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In Hussey v Cambridge, a police officer sued after he was suspended for four days without pay following a Facebook post he made criticizing a police reform bill named after George Floyd. [read post]
There have been quite a few “Halliburton” appeals in the last couple of decades and at least one example in the House of Lords/Supreme Court (Conor v Angiotech [2008]). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm by admin
When expert witnesses rely upon one or a few studies, which telegraph internal validity, this litigation strategy may provide the strongest evidence against the study’s being reasonably relied upon, or its providing “sufficient facts and data” to support an admissible expert witness opinion. [1] Daubert v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 11:17 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
However, the day after its approval, this ordinance was stopped in court by a lawsuit led by Peter Schey and known as League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by fjhinojosa
Casto’s article Robert Jackson’s Critique of Trump v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the recent case (Taylor v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Korinne Dunn
These states follow the logic of Marvin v. [read post]