Search for: "PORTFOLIO TECHNOLOGIES V ITC" Results 61 - 80 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2013, 2:49 pm by Florian Mueller
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington published his FRAND rate-setting decision in the Microsoft v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:52 am by Florian Mueller
I've attended numerous SEP infringement trials and analyzed lots of documents from U.S. infringement lawsuits and ITC investigations. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:19 am by Stefanie Levine
The '985 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Avago Technologies et al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:19 am by Stefanie Levine
The '985 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Avago Technologies et al. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
IDT (EDTexweblog.com) District Court W D Virginia: Virginia Patent Foundation’s motion for reconsideration denied – Intervening rights still absolve GE of damages for activities before reexamination certificate issue date (Reexamination Alert) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Butamax  – BP-DuPont Biofuels JV takes Gevo to court (Green Patent Blog) Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products – ALJ Gildea grants motion to terminate investigation in Certain Electronic… [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
  The federal court filing comes after the US International Trade Commission (ITC) issued an early ruling that Motorola had not infringed the patents at dispute in an ITC claim brought by Apple. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:00 am
: (IP ThinkTank),IBM patents and defensive publishing: (Securing Innovation),Stockholm Network paper on developing nations and pharmaceutical patents: (IPcentral Weblog),Good and bad news for the IP industry if recession does bite: (IAM),Business Software Alliance: Piracy economic impact is tens of billions of dollars: (Ars Technica),IP portfolio costs - when less is more: (IP ThinkTank),IP protection: Competitive market default: (The … [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
Nice IP litigators finish first (The IP ADR Blog) RTI International using software program to prioritise IP portfolio (Intellectual Property Marketing Advisor) WIPO DG Francis Gurry speaks on his plans (Intellectual Property Watch) WIPO expands its distance learning program (WIPO) WTO establishes task force to assess impact of financial crisis on the WTO and implications for multilateral trading system (Spicy IP)   Global - Patents Aspator (patent downloading tool) updated… [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Think Tank) World Customs Organisation to replace controversial IP standards body; doubts remain (Intellectual Property Watch) Rebalance your IP portfolio for 2009 (IP Spotlight) IAM blog’s IP personalities of 2008 (IAM) Key themes for 2009 – from green patents to the IP marketplace (IAM) Experts examine strategies for IP and sustainable development (Intellectual Property Watch) The paradox of accounting innovation (IP Frontline) Saving your IP (Patent Baristas)… [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
(IP Spotlight) (Excess copyright) (Patent Docs) (Spicy IP) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) CAFC greatly limits software and business method patents: In re Bilksi (IP Law Observer) (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (IP Spotlight) (The Prior Art) (Patent Baristas) (EFF) (Patent Prospector) (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property) (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IP Updates) (Daily Dose of IP) (PLI) (Green… [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO: (Managing… [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
: (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), Does Petra Moser show patents encourage successful innovation? [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46)   Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46)   South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP)   Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]