Search for: "Page Associates v. District of Columbia"
Results 61 - 80
of 355
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
District Court for the District of Columbia prohibited Pack and his USAGM board of executives from continuing activities that violate the First Amendment rights of journalists and editorial employees at Voice of America, which is overseen by the USAGM. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm
These opinion pieces, which qualify for this list based on the number of page views during the past 12 months, are arranged below in alphabetical order by last name of author. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:01 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in an effort to enjoin the use of proxy voting. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:00 am
American Association of Political Consultants. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:47 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, followed in 1993 by her appointment to the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm
After finishing her clerkship in 1961, Columbia Law School hired Ginsburg as a research associate to co-author a book on civil procedure in Sweden – a job that required Ginsburg to learn Swedish. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm
All filings in the case are available at the excellent case page of Michel & Associates, the firm that won the case in district court and then before the three-judge panel. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 9:09 am
State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 10:44 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, sitting en banc, decided Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 4:35 am
Trump v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 12:36 pm
Issues in XY Planning Network, LLC., v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:39 am
Supreme Court case called Rinaldi v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:00 am
Television Post-Filing Announcements – Television stations licensed in the District of Columbia, Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia must begin broadcasts of their post-filing announcements concerning their license renewal applications on June 1. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch.… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch.… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch.… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch.… [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 9:47 am
In his view, the transport ban involves the same “core Second Amendment right” at the heart of the court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:37 pm
Attorneys for the plaintiffs are Michel Associates, and their page for all the filings in the case is here. [read post]
