Search for: "Page v. Board of Adjustment"
Results 61 - 80
of 251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2020, 6:07 pm
“The Court of Chancery and the Supreme Court seem to have adjusted pretty well to the constraints,” said Lawrence A. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am
Key Findings In nearly two of every three households in America with dependents, more than one person works to make ends meet. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
If you don’t trade secrets with your concierge, message boards offer some helpful advice for visitors to the court. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
Brandes, titled" Stare Decisis, Precedent and Dicta, appears in the March 2020 issue of the New York State Bar Journal, Vol.92, No. 2 at page 36. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:59 am
The appellant argued (statement of grounds of appeal, point II.2.1) that in the penultimate paragraph of page 6 of the description, laser cutting units are given as an example of a possible cutting unit. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Indeed, the potential relevance of the right to rectification has been highlighted by C-136/17 GC et. al. v CNIL which held that, in cases where a delisting of data is not applicable, a search engine is in any event required, at the latest on the occasion of the right for de-referencing, to adjust the list of results in such a way that the overall picture it gives the internet user reflects the [individual’s] current legal position, which means in particular that links… [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm
The following is our testimony to Kansas’ Senate Committee on Assessment and Taxation; and Kansas’ House Committee on Taxation Presenting: Kansas Tax Modernization: A Framework for Stable, Fair, Pro-growth Reform Table of Contents Introduction Corporate Income Tax Individual Income Tax State and Local Sales Tax Property and Related Taxes Other Tax and Revenue Introduction Thank you for inviting us to present today before your committee, and for the openness and hospitality we… [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
The City Board of Zoning Adjustment (“Board”) found that the proposed construction qualified for a CEQA Class 3 exemption, which allows for construction of new small structures of up to three single family residences in an urbanized area without environmental review. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
The City Board of Zoning Adjustment (“Board”) found that the proposed construction qualified for a CEQA Class 3 exemption, which allows for construction of new small structures of up to three single family residences in an urbanized area without environmental review. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm
If you have an announcement to add to the page, email us. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:50 am
We cover accommodation and board for all participants. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm
If you have an announcement to add to the page, email us. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:19 am
v=lzatElTvT6U. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:00 am
Strong v. weak corporate practice of medicine One of the tricks about corporate practice of medicine is that it varies by state and in some states the corporate practice of medicine is a really big deal. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am
If you have an announcement to add to the page, email us. [read post]
