Search for: "Park v. Administrative Director of the Courts "
Results 61 - 80
of 382
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
The court’s order in Missouri v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:00 am
Gavlin v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:31 pm
The Georgia Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Davis v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:26 am
Clews Land and Livestock, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
The Court held that the standard required when reviewing a contractual decision is akin to that adopted for judicial review of administrative action (i.e. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 9:37 am
Leone v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
This court’s attempt to reintroduce a National Parks-like “competitive harm” requirement really tends to undo what I think the Supreme Court sought to do in FMI. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 7:07 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 6:46 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:15 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:08 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 6:44 pm
Abbott Cinema West, LLC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:58 am
Breyer's passion is for administrative law, which is central to the gun control rulings of the last several years (District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:39 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:18 pm
Secondly: in the second part of the decision in Khan, the Court of Appeal resolved the tension between Avon Ground Rents Ltd v Child (2018) UKUT 204 (LC) and John Romans Park Homes Ltd v Hancock, 17 October 2019 (His Honour Judge Martin Rodger KC), unreported. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 12:52 pm
The Trans Future I Never Dreamed Of By Chase Strangio, Deputy Director for Transgender Justice, ACLU Chase Strangio writes about the importance of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Kindermann In a lengthy and unanimous reversal of the trial court on ESA and CEQA issues in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 7:07 am
This is wrong, as the LT/UT(LC) made clear, their task is to determine whether a breach has occured, not whether the landlord is entitled to any particular remedy (see, e.g., this decision)In Beaufort Park Residents Management Ltd v Sabahipour [2011] UKUT 436 (LC), the leaseholder had covenanted to allow the landlord, including its agents, to enter the flat on reasonable notice for the purpose of inspecting the condition of the flat. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 7:07 am
This is wrong, as the LT/UT(LC) made clear, their task is to determine whether a breach has occured, not whether the landlord is entitled to any particular remedy (see, e.g., this decision)In Beaufort Park Residents Management Ltd v Sabahipour [2011] UKUT 436 (LC), the leaseholder had covenanted to allow the landlord, including its agents, to enter the flat on reasonable notice for the purpose of inspecting the condition of the flat. [read post]
