Search for: "Parks v. Planning & Zoning Commission"
Results 61 - 80
of 166
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2018, 10:30 pm
Petitioner filed suit on both CEQA and Planning and Zoning grounds. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
Texas has an Access to Justice Commission; but don’t be fooled. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:26 am
Clews Land and Livestock, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
Living Rivers Council v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
The County of Santa Cruz, as part of its plan to overhaul its zoning ordinance, adopted three separate ordinance amendments to: (1) expand the minor exceptions to the zoning site standards; (2) alter the height, density, and parking requirements for hotels in its commercial districts; and (3) adopted an administrative approval process for some minor exceptions to the sign ordinance. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
The County of Santa Cruz, as part of its plan to overhaul its zoning ordinance, adopted three separate ordinance amendments to: (1) expand the minor exceptions to the zoning site standards; (2) alter the height, density, and parking requirements for hotels in its commercial districts; and (3) adopted an administrative approval process for some minor exceptions to the sign ordinance. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
The County of Santa Cruz, as part of its plan to overhaul its zoning ordinance, adopted three separate ordinance amendments to: (1) expand the minor exceptions to the zoning site standards; (2) alter the height, density, and parking requirements for hotels in its commercial districts; and (3) adopted an administrative approval process for some minor exceptions to the sign ordinance. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 7:36 pm
Defendants Montgomery County, the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission attempted to change the zoning of this area, impose new restrictions, and delay or deny water services to Plaintiffs’ property. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
The County of Santa Cruz, as part of its plan to overhaul its zoning ordinance, adopted three separate ordinance amendments to: (1) expand the minor exceptions to the zoning site standards; (2) alter the height, density, and parking requirements for hotels in its commercial districts; and (3) adopted an administrative approval process for some minor exceptions to the sign ordinance. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 6:26 pm
Clark v City of Portsmuth, 2017 WL 2797379 (NH 5/25/2017)Filed under: Historic Preservation, Zoning Boards of Appeal [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 9:57 am
”Facts: A developer submitted a zoning application to the Prince George’s Planning Board of Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (the “Commission”) to develop a certain tract of land for a mixed-use town center. [read post]
30 May 2017, 5:09 pm
Calvert Tract submitted a zoning application to the Prince George’s Planning Board of the Maryland–National Capital Park and Planning Commission seeking to use its 36 acre property for a mixed-use town center. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:47 pm
Residents Against Specific Plan 380 v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:37 pm
Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 6:16 pm
The City’s zoning code does not require Plan Commission approval for certain “permitted uses” in neighborhood shopping districts, such as grocery stores, restaurants, and theaters, but does require such approval for “conditional uses,” such as churches. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
The Hillsborough County Commission just adopted the Ordinance needed for dispensaries to go forward. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
The Hillsborough County Commission just adopted the Ordinance needed for dispensaries to go forward. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 9:56 pm
Friends of McMillan Park v DC Zoning Commission, 2016 WL 7174662 (DC App. 12/8/2016)Filed under: Comprehensive Plan, Current Caselaw, Historic Preservation, Planned Development Districts, Uncategorized [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 9:29 pm
The City of Binghamton’s Planning Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”) denied 26 Seminary LLC’s application for a variance. 26 Seminary LLC pointed to this denial as a basis for its non-class-based equal protection claim. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 10:24 am
The Planning Commission approved the project under a categorical exemption in CEQA Guidelines section 15303(c). [read post]
