Search for: "Parks v. Starks" Results 61 - 80 of 130
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2015, 4:03 am by Eric Turkewitz
 Over the course of the 30 years since I was graduated from law school, I’v become pretty confident that this is the way the system works. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In R v Marcott, Justices Arbour and Osler concurred that an element of the offense was “that deception is practiced…and that the person undertaking to tell fortunes represents that he has the power to do so with the intention that such representation should be believed”, and “[where an] assertion, or undertaking [to predict the future] is made for reward…with intent to deceive, the offense is complete. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 5:20 am by SHG
But the former paradigm, that created by the Supreme Court in Graham v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:06 am by Terry Hart
Such a view casts fair use as a privilege, not a right—a stark contrast to the former view of copyright itself as a privilege rather than a natural right. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 10:15 am
Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Boston lawyer Seth Jaffe of Foley Hoag on the firm’s blog, Law & The Environment Medical Malpractice Payments Were At Their Lowest in Over 20 Years – New Jersey lawyer David Cohen of StarkStark on the firm’s Nursing Home Law Blog  Top 5 Takeaways from MIE’s Annual National Fundraising Conference – Probono.net Development Associate Karin Romans on their blog, Connecting Justice Communities Sixth Circuit Holds Kentucky Bar… [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
In stark contrast, under Florida’s statute, a 4 The State of Washington adopted the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, but its legislature has deleted the “knowingly and intentionally” language from the model act’s mere possession statute. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:21 am by Abbott & Kindermann
However, there was a lack of substantial evidence to support the conclusion that the impacts to parks would be less than significant. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:40 pm by WIMS
" Van Hollen said that the problem has increased due to the Supreme Court's Citizens United v. [read post]