Search for: "Part 60 Put-Back Litigation"
Results 61 - 80
of 612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2022, 7:44 am
You can check out previous posts here: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 In this series so far, I’ve focused on strategies for preparing, submitting, and litigating CDA Claims. [read post]
1 May 2017, 7:48 am
Taliano, as individuals, agreed on December 16, 2016 to pay Blacklock’s a total of $21,750 within 60 days. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 1:54 pm
” Kagan went on to describe the lower court’s reasoning as “some kind of mishmash of a standard, which is part 60(b) and part 15(a). [read post]
11 May 2017, 6:30 am
A handful of bad apples can ruin it for everyone, but for the most part people just want to get back to their normal routine. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:19 am
The judgment was not intended to put the parties in a position they would have occupied had there never been a contract. [read post]
18 May 2011, 8:48 am
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, after the Senate put aside concerns about her lack of recent litigation work and voted today for her confirmation. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
Litig., 95 F. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:15 pm
I wanted to talk about another offshoot of the whole question of Power of Attorneys and the kind of litigation and some of the contentious issues that arise and that is the question of getting paid. [read post]
15 May 2008, 7:00 am
Litigation counsel and their clients are now arguably put on notice that data in RAM that can be modified up to several billion times per second should be considered a potentially relevant document that may need to be preserved as part of a litigation hold! [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:47 am
The simplest expression of this rule is in In re Part 60 RMBS Put – Back Litig. (195 AD3d 40 [1st Dept 2021]), the Court writing that “where the indemnification is broad, in the absence of limiting language, both intra-party and third-party claims are covered. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 12:36 am
In that case, Epic will either put it back right away (by complying with Apple's terms), or maybe appeal that denial to the Ninth Circuit, where things would probably take a couple of months. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:32 am
In terms of the history of this case, it was back on August 11, 2009, that the United States District Court Judge in the Eastern District of Texas issued its final order. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:51 am
This action will put money back in consumers’ pockets and make sure borrowers can get help they need. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 6:30 am
We are talking another back surgery, potentially paid for by work comp, on a guy in his later 60’s. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 8:47 am
But it’s often possible, and it’s part of your job. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 1:02 pm
Never too late 60 [week ending on Sunday 23 August] - Test-drive of the Unitary Patent Court, Parts V and VI |From food porn to porn with food: passion with Parmesan | USPTO Guidelines on patent eligibility | Red Bull fends off Crazy Bull in Greece | Biker Biker Biker Gang! [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:01 am
However, we anticipate that this point will be explored in future litigation. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm
The IPKat also ran a readers' poll in which 60% of the unusually round number of 500 respondents opined that the American Merck should give the name back to the German one.In short, the German Merck ('Merck') owned registered UK and international trade marks for the word MERCK for pharmaceuticals and other goods. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 6:42 am
And that's certainly part of it. [read post]
21 May 2021, 8:40 am
In 2011, wolf protections were recklessly rolled back in Idaho and Montana, as well as parts of Oregon, Washington and Utah through an act of Congress that removed federal wolf protections in these states and opened public hunting seasons. [read post]
