Search for: "Paul Mitchell v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am
MITCHELL WIGGINS, Appellant, v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 11:19 am
Aero v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:22 pm
Defendant Paul M. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0261p.06 2007/07/11 Parks v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Perhaps that is what Justice John Paul Stevens (Retired) had in mind when he stated last year: I really think that in regard to the death penalty . . . [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 4:06 pm
There have been a number of stories about the Andrew Mitchell libel case against the Sun this week. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:33 pm
Madera Unified School Dist. (9th Cir. 1992) ("An analysis of the five Mitchell [v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm
Danner, Duke Law School; Jerry Goldman, Northwestern University; Mitchell Kapor, Mitchell Kapor Foundation; Lawrence Lessig, Harvard Law School; Harry S. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm
Danner, Duke Law School; Jerry Goldman, Northwestern University; Mitchell Kapor, Mitchell Kapor Foundation; Lawrence Lessig, Harvard Law School; Harry S. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm
Ansari v Amini, heard 10 and 11 November 2020 (Julian Knowles J) This Round Up was compiled by Colette Allen who is the host of Newscast on Dr Thomas Bennett and Professor Paul Wragg’s The Media Law Podcast (@MediaLawPodcast). [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 6:31 am
Bradley NH-02 Paul Hodes v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 5:30 am
The featured Leaders in Law will be Mitchell Avila Katine and Paul Smith discussing their involvement in the landmark privacy law case that Smith argued before the Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am
Case Study: Beckman v Match.com The case in question–and the reason I wanted to write about this–involves Mary Kay Beckman, a 46-year-old Match.com user who was paired with suitor Wade Mitchell Ridley, 50, through the site. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:21 pm
Alex Loomis posted a summary of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Ziglar v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
Paul Bernal’s blog had a number of posts on the subject, including “Surveillance and Austerity” and “DRIP: normalising the surveillance state”. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 7:49 am
WISE AND PAUL B. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 10:45 am
Secunda, District Court Amicus Brief of Law Professors in Support of Defendants, Associated Oregon Industries v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
Paul, and was an Assistant Hennepin County Public Defender. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
Paul), and Lyons v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:07 am
As an example of the allegations, the label on Sexy Hair's brand of hair products states "Sold Only in Professional Salons" (compare this review), while other defendants represent that the quality of their products cannot be assured unless they are purchased through salons: John Paul Mitchell Systems' website states that its products "are only guaranteed when sold by a professional hair salon. [read post]
