Search for: "Paul Tam"
Results 61 - 80
of 166
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2017, 8:30 am
Paul Fire & Marine Ins. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 3:49 pm
The title of this post is the title of this notable new research published today in the Journal of Primary Prevention and authored by Bridget Freisthler, Andrew Gaidus, Christina Tam, William Ponicki and Paul Gruenewald. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 6:32 am
Paul B. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 8:51 am
Paul, Minnesota. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 11:28 am
Paul Oetken has approved a settlement agreement to resolve the Government’s claims against Walgreens. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 12:14 pm
Tam asks whether an Asian-American rock band called The Slants can trademark and own their own name. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:31 am
Colleagues demand Oregon law prof resign over Hallowe’en costume [Paul Caron/TaxProf; Eugene Volokh (“We have reached a bad and dangerous place in American life, and in American university life in particular. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am
” Justice Paul Pfeifer On October 25, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Antoon v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
Meanwhile, respondent Simon Tam waits in limbo. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:05 pm
Scott McBride, Baker Hostetler] Tags: California, class action settlements, forum shopping, Louisiana, qui tam Liability roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 2:49 pm
Here is the Paul Weiss attorneys’ guest post. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
In cases where the defendants are reluctant to upset the judge, a statute can allow anyone to sue, in the nature of a qui tam suit. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Trademark 1 Paul Heald, Testing Theories of Tarnishment in Trademark and Copyright Law Tarnishment should be treated like false advertising: you should have to prove some (likely) damage to your TM to win, rather than presumptions. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 3:32 am
Federal Circuit court of appeals says government can’t deny trademark as “disparaging” just because it frowns on its expressive content, implications are favorable for Washington Redskins in their legal case [Eugene Volokh, Paul Alan Levy, In Re Simon Shiao Tam opinion, case won by past Overlawyered guestblogger Ron Coleman] Mentally ill man walks into San Diego county recorder’s office, submits properly filled-out deed transferring major sports… [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:50 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held (In re Tam), by a 9-to-3 vote, that this exclusion of “disparaging” marks violated the First Amendment. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 9:00 am
Paul Denis brought the qui tam suit against Medco alleging the company defrauded state and federal insurance companies by hiding discounts it was receiving on drugs. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 9:00 am
Paul Denis brought the qui tam suit against Medco alleging the company defrauded state and federal insurance companies by hiding discounts it was receiving on drugs. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 9:00 am
Paul Denis brought the qui tam suit against Medco alleging the company defrauded state and federal insurance companies by hiding discounts it was receiving on drugs. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 9:37 am
The whistleblower suits resulted in the government paying out $435 million to individuals who exposed fraud and false claims by filing qui tam complaints. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
Rebecca Tushnet: And now for something different! [read post]
