Search for: "Paula Jones" Results 61 - 80 of 232
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2018, 8:30 am by Keith E. Whittington
When Bill Clinton asked the courts to dismiss Paula Jones’ civil suit arising from his conduct out of the presidential office, a unanimous Supreme Court ruled in Clinton v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:15 pm by Steve Vladeck, Benjamin Wittes
Jones, in which the court concluded that a sitting president is not absolutely immune from civil litigation for conduct that took place before he became president. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 10:17 am by William K. Berenson
Without getting into politics, you may have forgotten that it was almost exactly 20 years ago that the deposition of former President Clinton was released in the lawsuit filed by Paula Jones (after being ordered by the Supreme Court) that lead to his impeachment. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 8:48 am by Lyle Denniston
  That lawsuit, by an Arkansas woman, Paula Jones, had been filed in federal court. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 6:36 pm by Michael Froomkin
Actually, the issue of whether the Paula Jones precedent should apply with full force in state court is not frivolous at all. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 5:18 pm by Jeralyn
The Judge cited the Paula Jones case as one authority for the proposition that a lawsuit can proceed against a sitting President. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 6:14 am
Wilcox, Morrow Sodali, on Saturday, February 17, 2018 Tags: Board composition, Boards of Directors, Engagement, ESG, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, Proxy voting, Say on pay, Shareholder activism, Shareholder voting, Stewarship, Surveys Overseeing Cyber Risk Posted by Paula Loop, Catherine Bromilow, and Sean Joyce, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, on Sunday, February 18, 2018 … [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 5:24 am by Richard Primus
  The brief is submitted on behalf of three law professors who, twenty years ago, filed an amicus brief in support of Paula Jones’s right to sue Bill Clinton.I won’t here rehearse the substantive arguments that seem to me persuasive. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:50 am
We the people were led to think that the Packwood resignation meant that sexual harassment would now be taken seriously — now that the Republicans were taking it seriously.But it was not long before Democrats were hooting down anyone who wanted to listen to what Paula Jones had to say about Bill Clinton. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
While Bill Clinton was in office, Democratic voters (and many independents) were largely uninterested in what were facially credible allegations by Broaddrick and Paula Jones of very serious wrongdoing by Clinton. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 9:31 am
” In her original story, Paula Jones essentially said the same thing. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 7:01 am
Paula Jones was disbelieved by those who wanted to keep Bill Clinton in the White House, but believed by those who wanted him out.Hill knows this:Her case, like those of the women who accused Trump, she says, “was cast as a political story. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 8:31 am by ernst
His evidence extends beyond external affairs to issues of domestic policy, such as impoundment of funds, legislative vetoes, item-veto authority, presidential immunity in the Paula Jones case, recess appointments, and the Obama administration's immigration initiatives.The book has a pretty terrific dedication, or at least it seems so to us, as Congress returns to session during another yet fraught moment in the Presidency of Donald J. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 11:33 am by Jack Sharman
He carefully assesses the conduct of Starr and his prosecutors, including their contacts with the lawyers for Paula Jones and their hardball tactics with Monica Lewinsky and her mother. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
The most important book ever written on presidential impeachment is only 69 pages long. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 3:15 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Think Paula Jones—only about everything. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 6:06 pm by Steve Shiffrin
On the other hand, the Supreme Court held that Paula Jones was permitted to sue President Clinton (for conduct previously occurring while he was Governor of Arkansas) even though he was still President and despite a claim of Presidential immunity.The Court held that the President’s civil immunity was confined to his official acts. [read post]
9 May 2017, 2:17 pm by Steve Vladeck, Benjamin Wittes
Jones, where one of Paula Jones’s claims was a state-law defamation claim that encompassed statements made after Clinton assumed office, the Eighth Circuit went out of its way to note that it was “not free from doubt” whether defamation fell within the outer perimeter of the President’s official duties (but left the ultimate issue for the district court on remand). [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
12:00 – 12:30 PM Lunch, Knowles Conference Center, Georgia State Law 12:30 – 1:30 PM Keynote Address: Camara Jones, MD, MPH, PhD, Immediate Past President, American Public Health AssociationAchieving Health Equity: Tools for a National Campaign Against Racism 1:30 – 1:45 PM Break 1:45 – 3:15 PM Concurrent Sessions 2Health Care Financing and Regulation Session 2A – Room 341Antitrust, False Claims Act, and HSAsModerator: Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University… [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 1:12 pm by Chris Castle
[Cross posted from Artist Rights Watch] I want to call your attention to a letter by members of the Content Creators Coalition regarding the Copyright Office. [read post]