Search for: "Pennington v. Pennington" Results 61 - 80 of 334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2011, 8:46 am by Diana L. Skaggs
Crossfield that a change in PRC was a modification of custody, but that the Crossfield holding is overruled by Pennington v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“There is a ‘sham’ exception to the Noerr-Pennington doctrine which applies in ‘situations in which persons use the governmental process—as opposed to the outcome of that process—as an anticompetitive weapon'” (Singh v Sukhram, 56 AD3d 187, 192 [emphasis omitted], quoting Columbia v Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc., 499 US 365, 380; see Alfred Weissman Real Estate v Big V Supermarkets, 268… [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 6:55 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Lochte then assigned Pennington his claim against USAA for its failure to defend him in the Pennington v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:15 am by CMS
In this case, Catherine McAndrew, a Senior Associate in the Insurance and Reinsurance team at CMS, comments on the Supreme Court’s decision in TUI Limited v Griffiths [2023] UKSC 48I, which was handed down on 29 November 2023. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 1:53 pm
This story from my hometown paper, the Tuscaloosa News, certainly puts a new spin on Board of Education v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 2:00 pm
It’s worth noting that in his December 2016 ruling, Judge Viken cited the 1954 Supreme Court decision in Brown v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 5:45 am
The circumstances in which UIM coverage can be stacked and, sadly, in which it cannot were addressed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Pennington v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:31 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Attached to this complaint as “Exhibit 1″ is the transcript of one such Pennington  County hearing. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm by Michael Stevens
Bailey     Eastern District of Kentucky at Covington 09a0022p.06  Dennis Pennington v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm by Michael Stevens
Bailey     Eastern District of Kentucky at Covington 09a0022p.06  Dennis Pennington v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:58 am by Joy Waltemath
Nonetheless, because the Noerr-Pennington doctrine has an exception for sham petitions, and the Board failed to address whether the casino’s petition was a sham, the appeals court remanded the matter so that the Board may consider that question in the first instance (Venetian Casino Resort, L.L.C. v. [read post]