Search for: "People v. Vice" Results 61 - 80 of 2,312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by jonathanturley
The clause was created in reference to a real Civil War in which over 750,000 people died in combat. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
  He makes a similar inference (at 61) from the silence of most people on the issue of self-execution. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:18 am by GSU Law Student
While there, he studied under Charles Hamilton Houston, the vice dean at the law school and later, the director of NAACP’s Legal Defense and Education Fund. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am by Rob Robinson
That same year, in Caratube v Kazakhstan, confidential information was leaked from the Kazakh government’s IT system and the claimant eventually obtained some of the leaked documents. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:12 pm by Adam White
The administrative state’s ruinous instability is one of the worst vices of modern American government. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
To that end, the Court noted that MK had been 69 years old at the time of his termination, at which point he had been employed by the employer as their Vice President for 18.5 years. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
To that end, the Court noted that MK had been 69 years old at the time of his termination, at which point he had been employed by the employer as their Vice President for 18.5 years. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Any regulatory changes aimed at addressing the over-inclusive aspect may worsen the under-inclusive aspect, and vice versa. [read post]