Search for: "People v. Wong" Results 61 - 80 of 261
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
I took a quick look at Greene’s amicus brief in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Supreme Court has, in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
At trial, whether civil or criminal, people’s words are frequently going to serve as evidence. [read post]
23 May 2021, 8:37 am
European Parliament resolution of 20 May 2021 on Chinese countersanctions on EU entities and MEPs and MPs (2021/2644(RSP))The European Parliament,–  having regard to its previous resolutions and reports on the situation in China and EU-China relations, in particular those of 21 January 2021 on the crackdown on the democratic opposition in Hong Kong(1) and of 17 December 2020 on forced labour and the situation of the Uyghurs in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region(2)… [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 3:48 pm by Josh Blackman
Under these rules, Pastor Wong and Karen Busch can sit for a haircut with 10 other people in a barbershop, eat in a half-full restaurant (with members of 20 different families), or ride with 15 other people on a city bus, but they cannot host three people from different households for a Bible study indoors or in their backyards. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
I recently viewed Allen v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Earlier this month, I signed onto an amicus brief urging the New York Court of Appeals to grant review in the case of NHRP v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Under the (perhaps largely defunct) “Lemon test” from Lemon v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am by Josh H. Escovedo and Zack Thompson
Supreme Court issued numerous landmark decisions in 2020, among those—for trademark scholars and practitioners—Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
This column will develop these two perspectives.Easier to DefendSince the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]