Search for: "People v American Hope Group, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2022, 6:28 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the Sept. 28 and Oct. 7 conferences) Juno Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm by Keith Jones
United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999) (held that plaintiffs were not disabled under the ADA because corrective mitigating  measures must be taken into account when determining if someone is impaired) and in Toyota Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am by Vincent LoTempio
" A guest post for the Fehribach Group Blog Juli Paini, the director for the City of Indianapolis Office of Disability Affairs, says that "The ADA helped raise my comfort level talking about my disability, as well as the comfort level of the people around me. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 11:19 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCECOMPANY, INC., AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., AIG SPECIALITY CLAIMS SERVICES, INC., CHARTIS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants.Case No. 5:10-cv-116 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT 2011 U.S. [read post]
19 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
It was to avoid this sort of entanglement that the Second Circuit held in Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
A group of 14 employees initially filed a class action suit under Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act in October 2008 (Brown, et al. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
Today, the NRA’s American Rifleman and the Sierra Club’s Sierra magazines are likewise published by organizations that are primarily advocacy groups, like the SEIU. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Wrentham, MA; Paul Ross, President) American Pie Pizza, Inc. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm by Keith Jones
United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999) (held that plaintiffs were not disabled under the ADA because corrective mitigating  measures must be taken into account when determining if someone is impaired) and in Toyota Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 7:22 pm by Joy Waltemath
Even if the comments were “stray remarks,” they were made at the meeting during which the employee was demoted, which gave them more weight (Patricia Grenier v Key Floral, Inc). [read post]