Search for: "People v Challenger"
Results 61 - 80
of 18,450
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2020, 4:10 am
The complaint (full text) in Edgewater Christian Fellowship v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:02 pm
Burwell have standing to challenge the subsidies going to people enrolled in the federal exchange under the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 9:15 am
The case was People v Luciano, 2007 NY Slip Op 06341. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:52 pm
“City of Tulsa argues it has the ability to prosecute Native people under pre-statehood law; A pre-statehood law, known as the Curtis Act, was used to force allotment; It’s now being used as the latest way to challenge the landmark McGirt v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 8:26 am
In People v. [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 9:11 pm
People v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 7:26 am
Related posts:So Much For the Commerce Clause Challenge to Individual Mandate Being “Frivolous” Florida Suit Poses a Challenge to Health Care Law A Commandeering of the People [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 7:36 am
To bypass the highly relevant Herbert v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 11:22 am
In Patel v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 12:08 pm
The case, US v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 7:39 am
In People v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 7:45 am
In Hamdi v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 6:05 pm
" As summarized in a press release from the National Center for Lesbian Rights:The lawsuit challenges several Utah laws and regulations that prevent positive portrayals of gay, lesbian, and bisexual people in curricula, classroom discussions, and student clubs. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 11:23 am
Rokita, cases that challenge Indiana's voter ID law. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 12:30 pm
The Amendment was added by the Irish people in order to prevent the judicial creation of a right to abortion, as in Roe v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 12:43 pm
The policy at the heart of United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 8:30 am
In First Vagabonds Church of God v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:00 am
In Samuels v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm
In Jacobson v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 6:36 am
The Court of Appeals today, in People v Liden (#67) determined that an Article 78 proceeding is not the only valid way to challenge a determination by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders that he must register as a sex offender.Ordinarily such a determination is a simple matter of reading the statute. [read post]