Search for: "People v Cutting"
Results 61 - 80
of 5,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2011, 7:16 am
This contrasted with a more applicant-oriented description of the scheme given by Sedley LJ in R (Saadat) v Rent Service [2002] HLR 32: The fundamental purpose of the housing benefit scheme … is to ensure that people who are not under-occupying property and not over-paying rent are not made homeless through genuine inability to pay. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 2:19 pm
Not overruled, not (entirely) gutted, but definitely cut back. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:12 pm
”So I agree with the result of this case, which reverses the contrary (unpublished) decision of the Court of Appeal.The only thing I'd add to the California Supreme Court's discussion -- that perhaps cuts back a little bit on it (though, again, I still agree with it) -- is that all this stuff was spoken in Spanish. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
See McDonald v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:11 pm
Williams v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 1:52 pm
Whenever I see a fact pattern like this -- and I see it occasionally -- I really do wonder what the risk-benefit calculation of the relevant person looked like:"At about 9:00 p.m. on January 27, 2011, Maria Mendiola went to one of the hair salons she owned, and at which she cut hair, to pick up the mail after closing. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 9:52 pm
Last week, when the California budget was signed by Governor Schwarzenegger, he cut state funding for the ombudsman program. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:42 pm
Here's what you should not leave sitting in plain view during one of these inspections: "On the bar in the kitchen area . . . two lines of cocaine cut for use and two rolled dollar bills [and] another line of cocaine and a rolled bill in a bedroom. . . . [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:35 pm
SMUG v. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 2:37 pm
In the Landmark cases -- known as People v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
Another wonderful thing is the ability of a few people to cut to the chase and help large numbers of people understand relationships that otherwise would be hidden and esoteric. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 1:16 pm
Additional Resources: Nursing home workers condemn Baker budget cuts, July 14, 2016, By Kay Lazar, The Boston Globe More Blog Entries: Nickerson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 4:20 am
It was also held that there was not sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the council had taken the steps (required by section 507B(9)) to ascertain the views of qualifying young people. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 2:05 pm
We recently rejected a similar argument in People v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
And that's a difficult question, and one necessarily not answered by the statutory text.Second, I appreciated Justice Yegan's concurrence to his own opinion, but wonder how far it goes, or which way it cuts. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 9:41 am
State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 3:51 am
I was intrigued by the recent SC decision in Principal, Kendriya Vidyalaya and Ors. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 7:28 pm
In State v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:48 pm
The Dallas Morning News v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 11:00 am
v=Sx0vvn_Wn8o [read post]
