Search for: "People v Denis"
Results 61 - 80
of 15,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2020, 6:44 pm
This week the Supreme Court denied cert for a case that sought to chip away at the rights gained for LGBTQ+ people in Obergefell v Hodges. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 4:22 am
The evidence presented at the suppression hearing establishes that defendant was in custody in the police vehicle when the arresting officer asked him questions about his life and his church (see People v Paulman, 5 NY3d 122, 129; People v Yukl, 25 NY2d 585, 589, cert denied 400 US 851),and the People failed to establish that the arresting officer's questions did not constitute interrogation or its functional equivalent (see Rhode Island… [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:52 am
The Court held one case—People v Orlewicz — in abeyance, pending a decision in People v Vaughn. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 2:33 pm
According to the People v Savinon, 100 NY2d 192, 196 [2003] the missing witness instruction was to allow a jury to make an unfavorable interference based on a party’s failure to call a witness, who would usually support their version of the events. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:35 am
The California Supreme Court case of two juveniles caught throwing a cherry bomb at a hill that set off a large-scale brush fire was recently decided by the The People v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 12:45 am
"Chirife v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:49 pm
People v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:45 am
The HHS regulation makes clear that insurance companies and health care providers cannot deny health care services to trans people, deny insurance coverage to medically necessary gender-confirming care, or discriminate against trans people at their facilities. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 1:37 pm
People v. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 1:32 pm
People v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 8:25 am
The court denies a preliminary injunction. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 10:29 am
In SONY BMG Music v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:35 pm
Under the Fourth Amendment it is unreasonable to seize evidence unless the evidence was within the plain view of the officer’s sight according to People v Spinelli, 35 NY2d 77 [1974] and the property was recovered as a result of an inventory search. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 7:52 am
In People v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 8:22 am
May 22, 2023) The post Class Certification Denied Over Rightsowners’ Demands for Content ID Access–Schneider v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:23 am
To me, Bostock v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 10:10 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.WHO: ACLU Attorney Jennifer GranickWHAT: Oral arguments in ACLU Foundation v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 2:35 am
The name of the case is Arista v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
In Sambrano v. [read post]
