Search for: "People v Dyson"
Results 61 - 80
of 107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
Justice Dyson queries whether the second letter was confirming that request had been refused. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:42 am
The historian George Dyson has written that a Google engineer once said to him: “We are not scanning all those books to be read by people. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
Lord Dyson concluded in Lumba that this was no justification for indefinite detention, no matter how diligent the efforts of the Home Office. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:23 am
If she chooses to deport people to states where torture is endemic, those people must be able to challenge that decision in an impartial tribunal. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:11 am
And Lord Dyson said it was “contrary to the instincts of any common lawyer”. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
" Here's more:A Stanford law professor who helped argue Rumsfeld v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm
Subsequent case law has found that the duty might (depending on the facts of specific cases) apply to the following situations: prison authorities protecting inmates from harm from other prisoners [Edwards v UK (2002) 36 EHRR 487], or from suicide [Keenan v UK (2001) 33 EHRR 913]; immigrants in administrative detention [Slimani v France (2006) 43 EHRR 49]; military conscripts [Lilinc V Turkey (App. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:58 am
On 30 January, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson) will hear the case of PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (formerly VV (Jordan) and PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department). [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am
For the reasons given by Lord Phillips, Lord Judge and Lord Dyson, with which I agree, this form of parasitic accessory liability was not a basis on which the jury could convict. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 11:03 am
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital and Botham (FC) v Ministry of Defence [2011] UKSC 58 – read judgment. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:02 pm
The panel will be Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am
Lords Brown, Dyson, Walker and Kerr agreed. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:28 am
It is also a major issue where the employee is facing career-threatening allegations, such as teachers, doctors or even people regulated by the FSA. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
In R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal; R (MR Pakistan) (FC) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) the Supreme Court determined an important question of principle regarding the nature of the relationship between the Upper Tribunal and the High Court, namely the circumstances in which decisions of the Upper Tribunal are open to challenge in judicial review proceedings. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:57 pm
Besides IP law, I'm good at spotting trends, connecting people on social networks, fixing things, boiling eggs, and a handful of other things. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:02 am
Accord Dyson v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 5:45 am
In Burlington v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:10 am
Group 11 – Choice of Court and Arbitration V. [read post]
