Search for: "People v Eric Daniels" Results 61 - 80 of 165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am by William Ford
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am by William Ford
In response to Andrew McCarthy’s argument that Barr’s memo is legally sound, Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner countered McCarthy’s points and asserted that the memo is poorly reasoned. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian has a similar piece focusing on issues surrounding DNA testing as has the Thomson Reuters Foundation which has noted the increasing trend of people using DNA test kits. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In a similar vein, Equifax has been fined £500,000 by the ICO (the press release can be found here and Equifax’s response here) for its failure to protect the personal data of over 15 million people in the UK following a breach in 2017. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:15 pm by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
A review of Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, How Democracies Die (Crown, 2018). *** I What does the twilight of modern democracy look like? [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am by Josh Blackman
In contrast, the independent-counsel statute at issue in Morrison v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 12:13 pm by Hayley Evans
Circuit Court’s judgment affirming Judge Tanya Chutkan’s April 19 transfer injunction in Doe v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:26 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 9:58 am by Jon Penney
A great example of this assumption, leading to skepticism about whether surveillance may promote self-censorship or have broader societal chilling effects—is here expressed by University of Chicago Law’s Eric Posner. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 2:41 pm by Chuck Cosson
  But people make poor choices and selfish choices at least as often as they make virtuous ones. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
For example, Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner assert that the removal would be improper if it was done for improper motives: namely “personal, pecuniary, or purely partisan ends. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 8:51 am by Garrett Hinck
Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner argued that the Logan Act would be construed narrowly to limit its scope if courts ever applied it. [read post]