Search for: "People v Giles"
Results 61 - 80
of 212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2017, 1:30 pm
Thomas v Lambeth LBC, County Court at Central London, 16 March 2017 This is a s.204 appeal in the County Court of a vulnerability decision by Lambeth. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) And the upshot? [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 11:58 am
" (Giles v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Barnet, again. by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
However, that decision, as has been seen, depended heavily on the availability of DHPs for disabled people. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:59 am
For people without dependant children, 12 months proof of residency was required. g). [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm
It is also emphasized that the comparator must be with ordinary people, not ordinary homeless people. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm
YA v London Borough of Hammersmith And Fulham [2016] EWHC 1850 (Admin) YA was in care with H&F for a number of years and was now a care leaver. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 7:52 am
Giles. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 3:52 am
Some might think that Atkins v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm
We have seen such agreements raised before, for instance in London Borough of Southwark v Ofogba [2012] EWHC 1620 (QB), Lambeth LBC v Thomas (1997) 30 HLR 89 and Rochdale MBC v Dixon [2011] EWCA Civ 1173. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 12:22 pm
It is, as the High Court quite properly found, about people seeking to [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
O’Connor, Francis V., ed. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 1:44 pm
City West Housing Trust v Massey [2016] EWCA Civ 704 When considering a suspended possession order, how should the judge exercise their discretion where the tenant’s evidence has been disbelieved, in whole or part? [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 2:04 pm
We think there’s about 40 people there. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm
After a lengthy trek through Bubb, Puhlhofer, Cocks v Thanet District Council [1983] 2 AC 286, Ferdous Begum and R v Northavon District Council ex parte Palmer (1994) 26 HLR 572, the court concluded that Wednesbury was the appropriate test and further that “the range of rational decisions” was not so narrow as to determine the outcome. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
People v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:59 pm
The implications are clearly of significance for other councils, and will potentially impact many disabled people faced with the bedroom tax. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:08 am
Giles, like Buck v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm
By the way, the recording of Nicholas v Secretary of State for Defence, High Court, Chancery Division, August 24, 2015 (our note) has been discovered, after so many people have requested it for so long. [read post]