Search for: "People v Goode" Results 61 - 80 of 19,935
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2025, 3:36 pm by Brian Shiffrin
More recently, in People v Weinstein (42 NY3d 439 [2024), the Court of Appeal reversed convictions for criminal sex act and rape on a finding that it was prejudicial error to admit testimony of other women regarding alleged sexual assaults of the similar to those charged. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
  There's some solace, to be sure, that one (potentially) gets time off for good behavior, at least on the state side. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:32 am by Ross Davies
It is not an easy task, because there really is a great deal of good writing produced every year by lawyers and other people who write about the law. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:37 pm
X appeals to the NY Court of Appeals, which ruled 4-3 today (People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 4:57 am by New York Criminal Defense
by Jill Paperno, First Assistant Public Defender and author of  Representing the Accused: A Practical Guide to Criminal DefenseAmong some of yesterday's disappointing Court of Appeals decisions there is one that can be useful to us - People v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:19 pm
 And for good reason.Indeed, if the Court of Appeal is right, I can think of lots of assaults that suddenly become battery. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 5:16 am by Nathan Dorn
They are sometimes called the Sith, or the Good People, or the invisible folk. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 4:15 pm by William Morriss
In general, cloud computing is not good for privacy. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:56 pm
There's good reason, by the way, to believe that that number may well be inaccurate. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:01 am by Brooke MacKenzie
Although this is not how the Law Society framed its arguments, it seems to me that public outcry in matters like AA, Melnick, and Colangelo is at its core premised in the belief that people who committed certain offences should simply never be granted the privilege of a law licence. [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:45 pm by Orin Kerr
McCane, 573 F.3d 1037, 1041–45 (10th Cir. 2009) (same); People v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm
  However, that's in a section that's all about credits for people sentenced to prison and who have been "convicted" (rather than having their sentence deferred). [read post]