Search for: "People v Hamdy"
Results 61 - 80
of 92
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2011, 8:45 am
We have had our share of bad and evil people. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:55 am
Gates for some possible constraints on the term's breadth); and that the AUMF authorizes at least some military detention (see, for example, Hamdi v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 11:13 am
While the Courts imposed some rebukes on President Bush’s detention policy, in Hamdi v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 1:49 pm
Judge Hawkins punctuates his point by citing Justice Scalia’s dissenting opinion in Hamdi v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 8:06 am
No. 107-40, 115 Stat. 224 (2001); Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 4:35 pm
Yousuf (2010), on foreign sovereign immunities (posts here, here, and here), and Hamdi v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
” Even though it is clear that Congress has the constitutional power to suspend the right of habeas corpus, Stevens insisted, in joining a dissent in Hamdi v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 11:09 am
Fisher also said that Hamdi v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
In government and academia, she has shown a special capacity to bring together people with deeply held, conflicting views. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 12:02 pm
That is what the Supreme Court said as well in Hamdi v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:59 am
Hamdi v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:17 pm
But one of the things that I admired in Obama’s campaign rhetoric was the promise to return to a rule of law, to adhere to little footnotey-type thoughts like those expressed in the dissent by Justices Scalia and Stevens in Hamdi v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 9:29 am
For example, in Hamdi v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 9:07 pm
District Court focused mainly on what Congress meant nearly eight years ago in its first response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and on what the Supreme Court meant in 2004 in its first ruling in a modern detention case (Hamdi v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 1:18 pm
Indeed, Justice O'Connor's most quoted line in her 2004 plurality opinion in Hamdi v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 2:46 pm
Since 2001 the Supreme Court has ruled in three landmark detainee cases: Hamdi v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 8:57 pm
But in both Boumediene and today in Kennedy v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 1:15 pm
In 2001, the Supreme Court, in Zadvydas v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 12:05 am
In an article in yesterday's New York Times, Jonathan Mahler discusses how unusual it is for the Supreme Court to uphold a challenge to a president's wartime powers, as the Court did recently in Hamdi v. [read post]
