Search for: "People v Harrington"
Results 61 - 80
of 146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2016, 7:54 am
Tuesday’s argument in Sheriff v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:25 pm
For lawyers and lay people who generally don’t immerse themselves in the interstices of bankruptcy law, the most interesting part of today’s oral argument in Husky International Electronics v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
Connell is fine with that: “You know, people change their p [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 5:30 am
Altaffer Jr., a Dallas solo, represented a disabled inmate’s family in Holden v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 12:31 am
The opposing people put up by the second defendant are two company liquidators, Mr Olde and Mr Landrey. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:44 am
” [Flint River Steamboat Co. v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
After being charged with robbing and killing two people, the first defendant, William Leroy Barnes, “wore the fruits of [his] robbery – a gold necklace and a watch belonging to [one of his victims] – at an early court appearance. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:07 am
Tuesday’s argument in McFadden v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:53 am
The second of the Court’s trademark cases this week was Hana Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
Argument preview: What can a federal habeas petitioner argue when defending a judgment in his favor?
14 Oct 2014, 11:19 am
” But this argument can’t be entirely discounted, given the Court’s decision in Harrington v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 10:59 am
“There were all sorts of really qualified people who were available as possibilities. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:05 pm
And then SCOTUS added a gloss in Harrington v. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm
H-Net adds some interesting reviews this week, including one of David V. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:33 pm
Carey v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
The respondent’s name in the first case nicely captures most people’s instinctive reaction upon discussing AEDPA: Ryan v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
” Slip p. 4-5, Quoting Harrington v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:27 am
Conte v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am
In a decision akin to that delived by the Court of Appeal, a Queensland Magistrate has helped set out the test for domestic violence cases under that State's Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 3:27 am
To paraphrase Lord Atkin in United Australia v Barclays Bank[7], today, when the ghost of Mallet stands in the path of a just and equitable outcome, clanking its gender biased chains, the proper course for a judge is to pass through it undeterred. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm
See People v. [read post]
