Search for: "People v Jaime S."
Results 61 - 75
of 75
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2016, 9:42 pm
In Perez v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 1:31 pm
” However, according to FactCheck.org, a project of the University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg Public Policy Center, the ads intentionally misinformed the American people. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm
The Norwegian Data Protection Authority (DPA) raised concerns that the Covid-19 track and trace software, called “Smittestopp,” poses a disproportionate threat to user privacy — including by continuously tracking and uploading people’s GPS location to a national database for half a year. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 7:26 am
That case is pending in the Supreme Judicial Court under the caption Commonwealth v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 11:34 pm
Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun, who famously announced a similar reversal in his 1994 dissent from the Court's refusal to consider the relatively routine death penalty case of Callins v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
It will look back to several important recent Supreme Court decisions, in particular Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) suspended Jaime Cordova Manriquez's driver's license for driving with 0.08 percent or [*1230] more of alcohol in his blood. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 1:00 pm
As in the Johnson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:06 am
Let my people in. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Pharmaceutical Pricing Jaime King, University of California Hastings College of the Law, The Burden of Federalism: Challenges to State Attempts at Controlling Prescription Drug Costs Marc Rodwin, Suffolk University Law School, Controlling Pharmaceutical Prices: What the U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:35 am
” (U.S. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:44 am
BACKGROUND The OHCHR study underscored that prevention of human rights violations is primarily the responsibility of the State.[5] Prevention requires a proactive, continuing and systemic process of addressing risk factors and causes of human rights violations through a range of measures, including law, policy and practice, to ensure respect for and protection of all human rights for all those within the State’s territory or jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:38 pm
Golan v. [read post]
