Search for: "People v June"
Results 61 - 80
of 7,998
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 9:37 am
June 23, 2011), we can’t comment on the case.But some other people have. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:09 am
Today's Court of Appeals decision (People v Kent #70, 5/8/12) has two very important components. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 6:01 pm
On Wednesday, June 10, 2009, the Supreme Court denied leave to appeal in 14 cases; and granted a motion for reconsideration modifying its prior order in People v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:29 pm
It's one thing to say that a sentence of 78 years to life (for which the defendant will be eligible for parole, at the earliest, when he's 119) isn't "cruel and unusual" for a defendant who left threatening messages for his ex-wife and then drunkenly showed up at her house with a knife, only to be promptly shot in the groin by her shotgun-toting husband. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 11:27 am
Sometimes you can get the most accurate sense of a judge -- or anyone, for that matter -- by his or her reaction to close cases. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:51 am
I'm not a police officer. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:02 pm
This is an awesome opinion. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm
The trial court sentences the defendant to a total of eight years in prison, which included a concurrent 16 month sentence on a particular enhancement. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:14 pm
The first sentence of this opinion is somewhat funny. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:04 am
"Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity" does not mean "Innocent". [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 1:03 pm
Everyone admits it was wrong for the trial court to start the criminal jury trial with the defendant still wearing his prison orange jumpsuit. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 12:06 pm
On the "low level litigation" front, here's a neat little published opinion from the Appellate Division of the Superior Court. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 1:35 pm
This California Supreme Court decision resolves a complicated question about whether a particular sentencing statute is retroactive and, if it is, how that retroactive effect is to be effectively accomplished. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 8:49 pm
Tahisha Clay, a six-year old girl, and her nine-year old brother Stefan were tossing a ball back and forth to each other in the apartment complex in which they lived when the ball rolled down a hill. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:20 pm
It's rare to see a 1-1-1 decision in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:58 pm
The first sentence of this opinion begins: "Shelbe Wilkinson was found to be a mentally retarded person pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 6500. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:06 am
"White does not contest that he engaged in sexual intercourse with the victim. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 11:02 am
Question: What's the difference between 26 inches and 25 1/2 inches? [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:31 am
Here's a funny twist: The Court of Appeal reading a concurring opinion that insults the lower courts as a holding that justifies the practice of the lower courts that was insulted. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
Sometimes signalling your willingness to be reversed helps the Court of Appeal. [read post]
